HB 4769 — An Act to build resilient infrastructure to generate higher-ed transformation
MA 194 session · introduced 2025-11-18
Sponsors (0)
No sponsorships on file.
Action timeline (17)
- · house — H4750 , published as amended
- · house — Passed to be engrossed - 148 YEAS to 5 NAYS ( See YEA and NAY No. 109 )
- · senate — Read; and referred to the committee on Senate Ways and Means
- · senate — Committee recommended ought to pass with an amendment striking out all after the enacting clause and inserting in place thereof the text of S2962
- · senate — Order relative to subject matter adopted
- · senate — Placed in the Orders of the Day for Thursday, February 26, 2026
- · senate — Read second
- · senate — Amended by striking out all after the enacting clause and inserting in place thereof the text of S2962
- · senate — Ordered to a third reading
- · senate — Read third
- · senate — Reprinted, as amended, see S2993
- · senate — Passed to be engrossed -- see Roll Call #140 (Yeas 38 to Nays 0)
- · house — House NON-concurred in the Senate amendment
- · house — Committee of conference appointed - (D. Rogers-Finn-Pease)
- · senate — Rules suspended
- · senate — Senate insists on its amendment
- · senate — Committee of conference appointed (Comerford-Rush-Dooner), in concurrence
Text versions (0)
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
No CRS reports cite this bill yet.
Who matters on this bill
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no