HR 264 — House Resolution 264 of 2026
MI 2025 session · introduced 2026-03-18
Sponsors (8)
- John Fitzgerald (OTHER, MI-83) — sponsor
- Joseph Tate (OTHER, MI-9) — cosponsor
- Kelly Breen (OTHER, MI-21) — cosponsor
- Carol Glanville (OTHER, MI-84) — cosponsor
- Reggie Miller (OTHER, MI-31) — cosponsor
- Tonya Phillips (OTHER, MI-7) — cosponsor
- Veronica Paiz (OTHER, MI-10) — cosponsor
- Angela Witwer (OTHER, MI-76) — cosponsor
Action timeline (2)
- · house — introduced by Representative Rep. John Fitzgerald
- · house — adopted
Text versions (0)
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
No CRS reports cite this bill yet.
Who matters on this bill
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | John Fitzgerald (OTHER, state_lower MI-83) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 2 | Angela Witwer (OTHER, state_lower MI-76) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 3 | Carol Glanville (OTHER, state_lower MI-84) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 4 | Joseph Tate (OTHER, state_lower MI-9) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 5 | Kelly Breen (OTHER, state_lower MI-21) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 6 | Reggie Miller (OTHER, state_lower MI-31) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 7 | Tonya Phillips (OTHER, state_lower MI-7) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 8 | Veronica Paiz (OTHER, state_lower MI-10) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no