LB 867 — Appropriation Bill
NE 109 session
Appropriation Bill
Sponsors (1)
- Brian Hardin (OTHER, NE-48) — sponsor
Action timeline (10)
- · unicameral — Placed on General File
- · unicameral — Date of introduction
- · unicameral — Advanced to Enrollment and Review Initial
- · unicameral — Placed on Select File
- · unicameral — Clements MO554 Indefinitely postpone filed
- · unicameral — Clements motion to suspend the rules to allow for the A bill for LB867 to be indefinitely postponed and for the appropriations for this bill to be contained in LB1209 filed
- · unicameral — Indefinitely postponed
- · unicameral — Clements MO554 prevailed
- · unicameral — Clements motion to suspend the rules to allow for the A bill for LB867 to be indefinitely postponed and for the appropriations for this bill to be contained in LB1209 prevailed
- · unicameral — Provisions/portions of LB867A amended into LB1209 by rules suspension
Text versions (1)
- Introduced — PDF
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
No CRS reports cite this bill yet.
Who matters on this bill
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brian Hardin (OTHER, unicameral NE-48) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no