LB 1073 — Require commercial motor vehicle driver training to include antitrafficking training
NE 109 session
Require commercial motor vehicle driver training to include antitrafficking training
Sponsors (1)
- Carolyn Bosn (OTHER, NE-25) — sponsor
Action timeline (8)
- · unicameral — Date of introduction
- · unicameral — Kauth FA732 filed
- · unicameral — Referred to Transportation and Telecommunications Committee
- · unicameral — Hardin name added
- · unicameral — Notice of hearing for February 17, 2026
- · unicameral — Sanders name added
- · unicameral — Provisions/portions of LB1073 amended into LB1126 by AM2432
- · unicameral — Indefinitely postponed
Text versions (1)
- Introduced — PDF
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
No CRS reports cite this bill yet.
Connected on the graph
1 typed relationship in the influence graph — 0 inbound, 1 outbound, grouped by type.
referred to committee (1)
| date | dir | entity | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | → | Transportation and Telecommunications | — | ne-leg-action |
Who matters on this bill
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carolyn Bosn (OTHER, unicameral NE-25) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no
Timeline
Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; the inline strip under the row shows the counterpart's own context (a bill's latest action, a hearing's chamber + date, a filing's form type + filed date, a clip's source + excerpt) so the timeline reads like a Wikipedia citation rail.
- 2026-05-25 · was referred to Transportation and Telecommunications · ne-leg-action