LB 1210 — Eliminate an obsolete transfer relating to the Cash Reserve Fund
NE 109 session
Eliminate an obsolete transfer relating to the Cash Reserve Fund
Sponsors (1)
- Robert Clements (OTHER, NE-2) — sponsor
Action timeline (18)
- · unicameral — Date of introduction
- · unicameral — Kauth FA870 filed
- · unicameral — Referred to Appropriations Committee
- · unicameral — Notice of hearing for February 02, 2026
- · unicameral — Appropriations priority bill
- · unicameral — Clements AM2640 filed
- · unicameral — Placed on General File
- · unicameral — Clements FA1055 filed
- · unicameral — Advanced to Enrollment and Review Initial
- · unicameral — Clements AM2661 lost
- · unicameral — Conrad AM2690 lost
- · unicameral — Clements AM2661 pending
- · unicameral — Conrad AM2690 pending
- · unicameral — Conrad AM2690 to AM2661 filed
- · unicameral — Clements AM2661 filed
- · unicameral — Clements AM2640 withdrawn
- · unicameral — Placed on Select File
- · unicameral — Indefinitely postponed
Text versions (1)
- Introduced — PDF
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
No CRS reports cite this bill yet.
Connected on the graph
1 typed relationship in the influence graph — 0 inbound, 1 outbound, grouped by type.
referred to committee (1)
| date | dir | entity | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | → | Appropriations | — | ne-leg-action |
Who matters on this bill
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Robert Clements (OTHER, unicameral NE-2) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no
Timeline
Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; the inline strip under the row shows the counterpart's own context (a bill's latest action, a hearing's chamber + date, a filing's form type + filed date, a clip's source + excerpt) so the timeline reads like a Wikipedia citation rail.
- 2026-05-25 · was referred to Appropriations · ne-leg-action