SB 561 — relative to change of address for certain game operator employer licensees.
NH 2026 session
Sponsors (5)
- Keith R. Murphy (R, NH-16) — sponsor
- David H. Watters (D, NH-4) — cosponsor
- Kevin A. Avard (R, NH-12) — cosponsor
- Bill M. Gannon (R, NH-23) — cosponsor
- Victoria Sullivan (R, NH-18) — cosponsor
Action timeline (6)
- · senate — Introduced 01/07/2026 and Referred to Ways and Means; SJ 1
- · senate — Hearing: 01/21/2026, Room 122-123, SH, 10:20 am; SC 2
- · senate — Committee Report: Inexpedient to Legislate, 03/05/2026, Vote 3-2, CC; SC 8
- · senate — SB 561 was Removed from the Consent Calendar; 03/05/2026; SJ 5
- · senate — Sen. Lang Moved Laid on Table, MA, VV; 03/05/2026; SJ 5
- · senate — Pending Motion Inexpedient to Legislate; 03/05/2026; SJ 5
Text versions (0)
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
No CRS reports cite this bill yet.
Who matters on this bill
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Keith R. Murphy (R, state_upper NH-16) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 2 | Bill M. Gannon (R, state_upper NH-23) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 3 | David H. Watters (D, state_upper NH-4) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 4 | Kevin A. Avard (R, state_upper NH-12) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 5 | Victoria Sullivan (R, state_upper NH-18) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no