S 4469 — Relates to absentee ballots for school district elections due to a religious commitment
NY 2025 session · introduced 2025-02-05
Relates to absentee ballots for school district elections due to a religious commitment or following such applicant's religious teaching or tenet that forbids secular activity on that day.
Latest action: 2026-05-21 — SENATE_FLOOR
Sponsors (1)
- Shelley Mayer (—, NY-37) — sponsor · 2025-02-05
Action timeline (6)
- · senate — REFERRED TO EDUCATION
- · senate — REFERRED TO EDUCATION
- · senate — 1ST REPORT CAL.1175
- · senate — AMENDED 4469A
- · senate — 2ND REPORT CAL.
- · senate — ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
No CRS reports cite this bill yet.
Connected on the graph
1 typed relationship in the influence graph — 1 inbound, 0 outbound, grouped by type.
sponsor of bill (1)
| date | dir | entity | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-05 | ← | Shelley Mayer | — | sponsor | sponsorship |
Who matters on this bill
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shelley Mayer (—, state_upper NY-37) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no
Timeline
Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; the inline strip under the row shows the counterpart's own context (a bill's latest action, a hearing's chamber + date, a filing's form type + filed date, a clip's source + excerpt) so the timeline reads like a Wikipedia citation rail.
- 2025-02-05 · sponsored by Shelley Mayer (sponsor) · sponsorship