HB 1247 — An Act amending Title 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in rules of evidence, providing for prohibition of deception during custodial interrogation of individual with intellectual disability or autism.
Congress · introduced 2025-04-17
Latest action: — Laid on the table, April 13, 2026
Sponsors
- Liz Hanbidge (D, PA-61) — sponsor · 2025-04-17
- Jose Giral (D, PA-180) — cosponsor · 2025-04-17
- Johanny Cepeda-Freytiz (D, PA-129) — cosponsor · 2025-04-17
- Carol Hill-Evans (D, PA-95) — cosponsor · 2025-04-17
- Tarik Khan (D, PA-194) — cosponsor · 2025-04-17
- Danielle Friel Otten (D, PA-155) — cosponsor · 2025-04-17
- Kristine C. Howard (D, PA-167) — cosponsor · 2025-04-17
- Benjamin V. Sanchez (D, PA-153) — cosponsor · 2025-04-17
- Joseph C. Hohenstein (D, PA-177) — cosponsor · 2025-04-17
- Melissa L. Shusterman (D, PA-157) — cosponsor · 2025-04-17
- Michael H. Schlossberg (D, PA-132) — cosponsor · 2025-04-17
- Perry S. Warren (D, PA-31) — cosponsor · 2025-04-17
- Ed Neilson (D, PA-174) — cosponsor · 2025-04-17
Action timeline
- · house — Referred to JUDICIARY, April 17, 2025
- · house — Reported as committed, April 13, 2026
- · house — First consideration, April 13, 2026
- · house — Laid on the table, April 13, 2026
Text versions
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Bill text
Printer's No. 1396 · 4,563 characters · source document
Read the full text
PRINTER'S NO. 1396
THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA
HOUSE BILL
No. 1247
Session of
2025
INTRODUCED BY HANBIDGE, GIRAL, CEPEDA-FREYTIZ, HILL-EVANS, KHAN,
OTTEN, HOWARD, SANCHEZ, HOHENSTEIN, SHUSTERMAN, SCHLOSSBERG
AND WARREN, APRIL 17, 2025
REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY, APRIL 17, 2025
AN ACT
1 Amending Title 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure) of the
2 Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in rules of evidence,
3 providing for prohibition of deception during custodial
4 interrogation of individual with intellectual disability or
5 autism.
6 The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
7 hereby enacts as follows:
8 Section 1. Title 42 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated
9 Statutes is amended by adding a section to read:
10 § 6145. Prohibition of deception during custodial interrogation
11 of individual with intellectual disability or autism.
12 (a) Prohibition.--A law enforcement officer may not use
13 deception during a custodial interrogation of an individual with
14 an intellectual disability or autism.
15 (b) Confession inadmissible.--An oral, a written or a sign
16 language confession of an individual with an intellectual
17 disability or autism made as the result of a custodial
18 interrogation conducted at a police station or other place of
19 detention on or after the effective date of this section shall
1 be presumed to be inadmissible as evidence against the
2 individual making the confession in a criminal proceeding or a
3 juvenile court proceeding for an act that, if committed by an
4 adult, would be a misdemeanor offense or felony offense under 18
5 Pa.C.S. (relating to crimes and offenses) if, during the
6 custodial interrogation, a law enforcement officer knowingly
7 engages in deception. The following apply:
8 (1) The presumption of inadmissibility of the confession
9 may be overcome by a preponderance of the evidence that the
10 confession was voluntarily given, based on the totality of
11 the circumstances.
12 (2) The burden of going forward with the evidence and
13 the burden of proving that the confession was voluntary shall
14 be on the Commonwealth.
15 (3) An objection to the failure of the Commonwealth to
16 call all material witnesses on the issue of whether the
17 confession was voluntary must be made in the trial court.
18 (c) Definitions.--As used in this section, the following
19 words and phrases shall have the meanings given to them in this
20 subsection unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
21 "Adult." An individual who is 18 years of age or older.
22 "Custodial interrogation." An interrogation of an individual
23 during which:
24 (1) the freedom of movement of the individual is
25 restrained by a law enforcement officer, even if the
26 individual is not under arrest, as determined by a reasonable
27 person under similar circumstances; and
28 (2) a question is asked that is reasonably likely to
29 elicit an incriminating response from the individual.
30 "Deception." The knowing communication of false facts about
20250HB1247PN1396 - 2 -
1 evidence or unauthorized statements regarding leniency by a law
2 enforcement officer to an individual subject to custodial
3 interrogation.
4 "Individual with an intellectual disability or autism." As
5 defined in section 5992 (relating to definitions).
6 "Law enforcement officer." As defined in section 5950(d)
7 (relating to confidential communications involving law
8 enforcement officers).
9 "Minor." An individual who is under 18 years of age.
10 "Place of detention." A building or police station that is a
11 place of operation for a State or municipal police department,
12 county sheriff department or any other law enforcement agency at
13 which individuals are or may be held in detention in connection
14 with criminal charges or allegations that those individuals are
15 delinquent minors.
16 Section 2. This act shall take effect in 60 days.
20250HB1247PN1396 - 3 -Connected on the graph
Outbound (1)
| date | type | to | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | referred_to_committee | Pennsylvania House Judiciary Committee | — | pa-leg |
The full graph
Every typed relationship touching this entity — 1 edge across 1 category. Grouped by what the connection is; the heaviest few are shown, with a link to the full list.
Committees
→ Referred to committee 1 edge
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Liz Hanbidge (D, state_lower PA-61) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 2 | Benjamin V. Sanchez (D, state_lower PA-153) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 3 | Carol Hill-Evans (D, state_lower PA-95) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 4 | Danielle Friel Otten (D, state_lower PA-155) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 5 | Ed Neilson (D, state_lower PA-174) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 6 | Johanny Cepeda-Freytiz (D, state_lower PA-129) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 7 | Jose Giral (D, state_lower PA-180) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 8 | Joseph C. Hohenstein (D, state_lower PA-177) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 9 | Kristine C. Howard (D, state_lower PA-167) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 10 | Melissa L. Shusterman (D, state_lower PA-157) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 11 | Michael H. Schlossberg (D, state_lower PA-132) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 12 | Perry S. Warren (D, state_lower PA-31) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 13 | Tarik Khan (D, state_lower PA-194) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no
Activity
Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.
- 2026-05-20 · was referred to Pennsylvania House Judiciary Committee · pa-leg