HB 1613 — An Act amending Title 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in juvenile matters, further providing for definitions and for release or delivery to court, providing for mandatory counsel, for child interrogation and for refusal to be recorded electronically and further providing for powers and duties of the Juvenile Court Judges' Commission.
Congress · introduced 2025-06-16
Latest action: — (Remarks see Senate Journal Page ), Oct. 8, 2025
Sponsors
- Liz Hanbidge (D, PA-61) — sponsor · 2025-06-16
- Carol Hill-Evans (D, PA-95) — cosponsor · 2025-06-16
- La'Tasha D. Mayes (D, PA-24) — cosponsor · 2025-06-16
- Tina M. Davis (D, PA-141) — cosponsor · 2025-06-16
- Arvind Venkat (D, PA-30) — cosponsor · 2025-06-16
- Chris Pielli (D, PA-156) — cosponsor · 2025-06-16
- Aaron Bernstine (R, PA-8) — cosponsor · 2025-06-16
- Kristine C. Howard (D, PA-167) — cosponsor · 2025-06-16
- Nikki Rivera (D, PA-96) — cosponsor · 2025-06-16
- Benjamin V. Sanchez (D, PA-153) — cosponsor · 2025-06-16
- Jeanne McNeill (D, PA-133) — cosponsor · 2025-06-16
- Joseph C. Hohenstein (D, PA-177) — cosponsor · 2025-06-16
- Perry S. Warren (D, PA-31) — cosponsor · 2025-06-16
- Gina H. Curry (D, PA-164) — cosponsor · 2025-06-16
- Ben Waxman (D, PA-182) — cosponsor · 2025-06-16
- Dave Madsen (D, PA-104) — cosponsor · 2025-06-16
- Melissa Cerrato (D, PA-151) — cosponsor · 2025-06-16
Action timeline
- · house — Referred to JUDICIARY, June 16, 2025
- · house — Reported as committed, Sept. 23, 2025
- · house — First consideration, Sept. 23, 2025
- · house — Laid on the table, Sept. 23, 2025
- · house — Removed from table, Oct. 7, 2025
- · house — Second consideration, with amendments, Oct. 8, 2025
- · house — Re-committed to APPROPRIATIONS, Oct. 8, 2025
- · house — (Remarks see Senate Journal Page ), Oct. 8, 2025
Text versions
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Bill text
Printer's No. 1930 · 9,832 characters · source document
Read the full text
PRINTER'S NO. 1930
THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA
HOUSE BILL
No. 1613
Session of
2025
INTRODUCED BY HANBIDGE, HILL-EVANS, MAYES, T. DAVIS, VENKAT,
PIELLI, BERNSTINE, HOWARD, RIVERA, SANCHEZ, McNEILL,
HOHENSTEIN AND WARREN, JUNE 16, 2025
REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY, JUNE 16, 2025
AN ACT
1 Amending Title 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure) of the
2 Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in juvenile matters,
3 further providing for definitions and for release or delivery
4 to court, providing for mandatory counsel and for child
5 interrogation and further providing for powers and duties of
6 the Juvenile Court Judges' Commission.
7 The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
8 hereby enacts as follows:
9 Section 1. Section 6302 of Title 42 of the Pennsylvania
10 Consolidated Statutes is amended by adding a definition to read:
11 § 6302. Definitions.
12 The following words and phrases when used in this chapter
13 shall have, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the
14 meanings given to them in this section:
15 * * *
16 "Custodial interrogation." The following:
17 (1) Questioning or other conduct by a law enforcement
18 officer which:
19 (i) is reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating
1 response from an individual; and
2 (ii) occurs when a reasonable individual in the same
3 circumstances would consider that the individual was in
4 custody.
5 (2) The term includes giving a required warning, advice
6 of rights of the individual being questioned and waiver of
7 rights by the individual.
8 * * *
9 Section 2. Section 6326(a) introductory paragraph, (1) and
10 (3) of Title 42 are amended to read:
11 § 6326. Release or delivery to court.
12 (a) General rule.--A person taking a child into custody[,
13 with all reasonable speed] shall immediately and without first
14 taking the child elsewhere[, shall]:
15 (1) notify [the parent, guardian or other custodian of
16 the apprehension of the child and his whereabouts;], or cause
17 to be notified, the parent, guardian or other custodian of:
18 (i) the child's location;
19 (ii) the reason for the child being taken into
20 custody; and
21 (iii) instructions on how the parent, guardian or
22 custodian may make immediate in-person contact with the
23 child;
24 * * *
25 (3) bring the child before the court or deliver him to a
26 detention or shelter care facility designated by the court or
27 to a medical facility if the child is believed to suffer from
28 a serious physical or mental condition or illness which
29 requires prompt treatment. He shall promptly give written
30 notice, together with a statement of the reason for taking
20250HB1613PN1930 - 2 -
1 the child into custody, to a parent, guardian, or other
2 custodian and to the court.
3 * * *
4 Section 3. Title 42 is amended by adding sections to read:
5 § 6329. Mandatory counsel.
6 (a) Custodial interrogation.--A law enforcement officer may
7 not conduct a custodial interrogation of a child until:
8 (1) The child has consulted with an attorney who is:
9 (i) retained by the parent, guardian or custodian of
10 the child; or
11 (ii) provided by the office of the public defender.
12 (2) The law enforcement officer has made an effort
13 reasonably calculated to give actual notice to the parent,
14 guardian or custodian of the child that the child will be
15 interrogated.
16 (b) Conditions of counsel.--A consultation with an attorney
17 under this section:
18 (1) Shall be:
19 (i) Conducted in a manner consistent with the Rules
20 of Professional Conduct.
21 (ii) Confidential.
22 (2) May be:
23 (i) in person; or
24 (ii) by telephone or video conference.
25 (c) Communication with parents.--To the extent practicable
26 and consistent with the Rules of Professional Conduct, an
27 attorney providing consultation under this section shall
28 communicate and coordinate with the parent, guardian or
29 custodian of the child in custody.
30 (d) Conditions of counsel.--The requirement of consultation
20250HB1613PN1930 - 3 -
1 with an attorney under this section:
2 (1) May not be waived.
3 (2) Applies regardless of whether the child is in
4 delinquency or criminal proceedings.
5 (e) Record of counsel.--
6 (1) A law enforcement agency conducting an interrogation
7 of a child shall maintain a record of the notification or
8 attempted notification of a parent, guardian or custodian
9 under section 6326 (relating to release or delivery to
10 court), including:
11 (i) a signed statement by a duly authorized law
12 enforcement officer employed by the agency that an
13 attempt to notify a parent, guardian or custodian was
14 made;
15 (ii) the name of the person sought to be notified;
16 and
17 (iii) the method of the attempted notification.
18 (2) A law enforcement agency conducting an interrogation
19 of a child shall maintain a record of the name of the
20 attorney contacted and the county in which the attorney
21 provided the consultation.
22 (3) An attorney contacted to provide legal consultation
23 to a child under this section shall provide to a law
24 enforcement officer the information required to be maintained
25 under paragraph (2).
26 (f) Exception.--
27 (1) Notwithstanding the requirements of this section, a
28 law enforcement officer may conduct an otherwise lawful
29 custodial interrogation of a child if:
30 (i) the law enforcement officer reasonably believes
20250HB1613PN1930 - 4 -
1 that the information sought is necessary to protect
2 against an imminent threat to public safety; and
3 (ii) the questions posed to the child by the law
4 enforcement officer are limited to those questions
5 reasonably necessary to obtain the information necessary
6 to protect against the imminent threat to public safety.
7 (2) As used in this subsection, the term "threat to
8 public safety" shall be construed in a manner consistent with
9 the judicially recognized exception to the requirements of
10 Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966).
11 § 6329.1. Child interrogation.
12 (a) Recording.--
13 (1) Unless it is impossible or unsafe to do so, an
14 interrogation of a child shall be recorded.
15 (2) In a jurisdiction that has adopted the use of body-
16 worn digital recording devices by law enforcement officers,
17 the interrogation of a child may be recorded using a body-
18 worn digital recording device in a manner that is consistent
19 with departmental policies regarding the use of body-worn
20 digital recording devices.
21 (3) In a jurisdiction that has not adopted the use of
22 body-worn digital recording devices, the interrogation of a
23 child may be recorded using other video and audio recording
24 technology in a manner that is consistent with any policies
25 of the law enforcement agency regarding the use of video and
26 audio recording technology.
27 (4) A child shall be informed if the interrogation is
28 being recorded.
29 (b) Presumption.--
30 (1) There is a rebuttable presumption that a statement
20250HB1613PN1930 - 5 -
1 made by a child during a custodial interrogation is
2 inadmissible in a delinquency proceeding or a criminal
3 prosecution against that child if a law enforcement officer
4 negligently or willfully failed to comply with the
5 requirements of this section, section 6326 (relating to
6 release of delivery to court) or section 6329 (relating to
7 mandatory counsel).
8 (2) The State may overcome the presumption by showing,
9 by clear and convincing evidence, that the statement was made
10 knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily and that the
11 statement was not made by a child under duress or while the
12 child was experiencing a mental health crisis.
13 Section 4. Section 6373 of Title 42 is amended by adding a
14 paragraph to read:
15 § 6373. Powers and duties.
16 The commission shall have the power and is required to do the
17 following:
18 * * *
19 (5) Adopt rules concerning age-appropriate language to
20 be used to advise a child who is taken into custody of the
21 child's rights.
22 Section 5. This act shall take effect in 60 days.
20250HB1613PN1930 - 6 -Connected on the graph
Outbound (2)
| date | type | to | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | referred_to_committee | Pennsylvania House Appropriations Committee | — | pa-leg | |
| — | referred_to_committee | Pennsylvania House Judiciary Committee | — | pa-leg |
The full graph
Every typed relationship touching this entity — 2 edges across 1 category. Grouped by what the connection is; the heaviest few are shown, with a link to the full list.
Committees
→ Referred to committee 2 edges
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Liz Hanbidge (D, state_lower PA-61) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 2 | Aaron Bernstine (R, state_lower PA-8) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 3 | Arvind Venkat (D, state_lower PA-30) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 4 | Ben Waxman (D, state_lower PA-182) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 5 | Benjamin V. Sanchez (D, state_lower PA-153) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 6 | Carol Hill-Evans (D, state_lower PA-95) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 7 | Chris Pielli (D, state_lower PA-156) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 8 | Dave Madsen (D, state_lower PA-104) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 9 | Gina H. Curry (D, state_lower PA-164) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 10 | Jeanne McNeill (D, state_lower PA-133) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 11 | Joseph C. Hohenstein (D, state_lower PA-177) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 12 | Kristine C. Howard (D, state_lower PA-167) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 13 | La'Tasha D. Mayes (D, state_lower PA-24) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 14 | Melissa Cerrato (D, state_lower PA-151) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 15 | Nikki Rivera (D, state_lower PA-96) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 16 | Perry S. Warren (D, state_lower PA-31) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 17 | Tina M. Davis (D, state_lower PA-141) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no
Activity
Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.
- 2026-05-20 · was referred to Pennsylvania House Appropriations Committee · pa-leg
- 2026-05-20 · was referred to Pennsylvania House Judiciary Committee · pa-leg