HB 1699 — An Act amending Title 23 (Domestic Relations) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in child custody, further providing for award of custody, repealing provisions relating to relocation and providing for relocation.
Congress · introduced 2025-07-07
Latest action: — Referred to JUDICIARY, July 7, 2025
Sponsors
- Liz Hanbidge (D, PA-61) — sponsor · 2025-07-07
- Melissa L. Shusterman (D, PA-157) — cosponsor · 2025-07-07
- Jeanne McNeill (D, PA-133) — cosponsor · 2025-07-07
- Ben Waxman (D, PA-182) — cosponsor · 2025-07-07
- Carol Hill-Evans (D, PA-95) — cosponsor · 2025-07-07
- La'Tasha D. Mayes (D, PA-24) — cosponsor · 2025-07-07
- Kristine C. Howard (D, PA-167) — cosponsor · 2025-07-07
- Benjamin V. Sanchez (D, PA-153) — cosponsor · 2025-07-07
- Dan K. Williams (D, PA-74) — cosponsor · 2025-07-07
- Tim Briggs (D, PA-149) — cosponsor · 2025-07-07
- G. Roni Green (D, PA-190) — cosponsor · 2025-07-07
- Melissa Cerrato (D, PA-151) — cosponsor · 2025-07-07
Action timeline
- · house — Referred to JUDICIARY, July 7, 2025
Text versions
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Bill text
Printer's No. 2087 · 26,249 characters · source document
Read the full text
PRINTER'S NO. 2087
THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA
HOUSE BILL
No. 1699
Session of
2025
INTRODUCED BY HANBIDGE, SHUSTERMAN, McNEILL, WAXMAN, HILL-EVANS,
MAYES, HOWARD, SANCHEZ, D. WILLIAMS AND BRIGGS, JULY 7, 2025
REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY, JULY 7, 2025
AN ACT
1 Amending Title 23 (Domestic Relations) of the Pennsylvania
2 Consolidated Statutes, in child custody, further providing
3 for award of custody, repealing provisions relating to
4 relocation and providing for relocation.
5 The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
6 hereby enacts as follows:
7 Section 1. Section 5323(c) of Title 23 of the Pennsylvania
8 Consolidated Statutes is amended to read:
9 § 5323. Award of custody.
10 * * *
11 (c) Notice.--Any custody order shall include notice of a
12 party's obligations under section [5337] 5337.1 (relating to
13 relocation).
14 * * *
15 Section 2. Section 5337 of Title 23 is repealed:
16 [§ 5337. Relocation.
17 (a) Applicability.--This section applies to any proposed
18 relocation.
19 (b) General rule.--No relocation shall occur unless:
1 (1) every individual who has custody rights to the child
2 consents to the proposed relocation; or
3 (2) the court approves the proposed relocation.
4 (c) Notice.--
5 (1) The party proposing the relocation shall notify
6 every other individual who has custody rights to the child.
7 (2) Notice, sent by certified mail, return receipt
8 requested, shall be given no later than:
9 (i) the 60th day before the date of the proposed
10 relocation; or
11 (ii) the tenth day after the date that the
12 individual knows of the relocation, if:
13 (A) the individual did not know and could not
14 reasonably have known of the relocation in sufficient
15 time to comply with the 60-day notice; and
16 (B) it is not reasonably possible to delay the
17 date of relocation so as to comply with the 60-day
18 notice.
19 (3) Except as provided by section 5336 (relating to
20 access to records and information), the following
21 information, if available, must be included with the notice
22 of the proposed relocation:
23 (i) The address of the intended new residence.
24 (ii) The mailing address, if not the same as the
25 address of the intended new residence.
26 (iii) Names and ages of the individuals in the new
27 residence, including individuals who intend to live in
28 the new residence.
29 (iv) The home telephone number of the intended new
30 residence, if available.
20250HB1699PN2087 - 2 -
1 (v) The name of the new school district and school.
2 (vi) The date of the proposed relocation.
3 (vii) The reasons for the proposed relocation.
4 (viii) A proposal for a revised custody schedule.
5 (ix) Any other information which the party proposing
6 the relocation deems appropriate.
7 (x) A counter-affidavit as provided under subsection
8 (d)(1) which can be used to object to the proposed
9 relocation and the modification of a custody order.
10 (xi) A warning to the nonrelocating party that if
11 the nonrelocating party does not file with the court an
12 objection to the proposed relocation within 30 days after
13 receipt of the notice, that party shall be foreclosed
14 from objecting to the relocation.
15 (4) If any of the information set forth in paragraph (3)
16 is not known when the notice is sent but is later made known
17 to the party proposing the relocation, then that party shall
18 promptly inform every individual who received notice under
19 this subsection.
20 (d) Objection to proposed relocation.--
21 (1) A party entitled to receive notice may file with the
22 court an objection to the proposed relocation and seek a
23 temporary or permanent order to prevent the relocation. The
24 nonrelocating party shall have the opportunity to indicate
25 whether he objects to relocation or not and whether he
26 objects to modification of the custody order or not. If the
27 party objects to either relocation or modification of the
28 custody order, a hearing shall be held as provided in
29 subsection (g)(1). The objection shall be made by completing
30 and returning to the court a counter-affidavit, which shall
20250HB1699PN2087 - 3 -
1 be verified subject to penalties under 18 Pa.C.S. § 4904
2 (relating to unsworn falsification to authorities), in
3 substantially the following form:
4 COUNTER-AFFIDAVIT REGARDING RELOCATION
5 This proposal of relocation involves the following
6 child/children:
7 Child's Name Age Currently residing at:
8 ...................... ................. .......................
9 Child's Name Age Currently residing at:
10 ...................... ................. .......................
11 Child's Name Age Currently residing at:
12 ...................... ................. .......................
13 I have received a notice of proposed relocation and
14 1. .... I do not object to the relocation and I do not object
15 to the modification of the custody order consistent with the
16 proposal for revised custody schedule as attached to the notice.
17 2. .... I do not object to the relocation, but I do object to
18 modification of the custody order, and I request that a hearing
19 be scheduled:
20 a. .... Prior to allowing (name of child/children) to
21 relocate.
22 b. .... After the child/children relocate.
23 3. .... I do object to the relocation and I do object to the
24 modification of the custody order, and I further request that a
25 hearing be held on both matters prior to the relocation taking
26 place.
27 ................................................................
28 I understand that in addition to checking (2) or (3) above, I
29 must also file this notice with the court in writing and serve
30 it on the other party by certified mail, return receipt
20250HB1699PN2087 - 4 -
1 requested. If I fail to do so within 30 days of my receipt of
2 the proposed relocation notice, I shall be foreclosed from
3 objecting to the relocation.
4 ................................................................
5 I verify that the statements made in this counter-affidavit are
6 true and correct. I understand that false statements herein are
7 made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. § 4904 (relating to
8 unsworn falsification to authorities).
9 Date:
10 ................................................................
11 ................................................................
12 (2) An objection made under this subsection shall be
13 filed with the court within 30 days of receipt of the
14 proposed relocation notice and served on the other party by
15 certified mail, return receipt requested.
16 (3) If notice of the proposed relocation has been
17 properly given and no objection to the proposed relocation
18 has been filed in court, then it shall be presumed that the
19 nonrelocating party has consented to the proposed relocation.
20 (4) If a party who has been given proper notice does not
21 file with the court an objection to the relocation within 30
22 days after receipt of the notice but later petitions the
23 court for review of the custodial arrangements, the court
24 shall not accept testimony challenging the relocation.
25 (e) Confirmation of relocation.--If no objection to the
26 proposed relocation is filed under subsection (d), the party
27 proposing the relocation shall file the following with the court
28 prior to the relocation:
29 (1) an affidavit stating that the party provided notice
30 to every individual entitled to notice, the time to file an
20250HB1699PN2087 - 5 -
1 objection to the proposed relocation has passed and no
2 individual entitled to receive notice has filed an objection
3 to the proposed relocation;
4 (2) Proof that proper notice was given in the form of a
5 return receipt with the signature of the addressee and the
6 full notice that was sent to the addressee.
7 (3) a petition to confirm the relocation and modify any
8 existing custody order; and
9 (4) a proposed order containing the information set
10 forth in subsection (c)(3).
11 (f) Modification of custody order.--If a counter-affidavit
12 regarding relocation is filed with the court which indicates the
13 nonrelocating party both has no objection to the proposed
14 relocation and no objection to the modification of the custody
15 order consistent with the proposal for revised custody schedule,
16 the court may modify the existing custody order by approving the
17 proposal for revised custody schedule submitted under subsection
18 (c)(3)(viii), and shall specify the method by which its future
19 modification can be made if desired by either party. If a
20 counter-affidavit regarding relocation is filed with the court
21 which indicates the nonrelocating party objects either to the
22 proposed relocation or to the modification of the custody order
23 consistent with the proposal for revised custody schedule, the
24 court shall modify the existing custody order only after holding
25 a hearing to establish the terms and conditions of the order
26 pursuant to the relocation indicating the rights, if any, of the
27 nonrelocating parties.
28 (g) Hearing.--
29 (1) Except as set forth in paragraph (3), the court
30 shall hold an expedited full hearing on the proposed
20250HB1699PN2087 - 6 -
1 relocation after a timely objection has been filed and before
2 the relocation occurs.
3 (2) Except as set forth in paragraph (3), the court may,
4 on its own motion, hold an expedited full hearing on the
5 proposed relocation before the relocation occurs.
6 (3) Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) and (2), if the court
7 finds that exigent circumstances exist, the court may approve
8 the relocation pending an expedited full hearing.
9 (4) If the court approves the proposed relocation, it
10 shall:
11 (i) modify any existing custody order; or
12 (ii) establish the terms and conditions of a custody
13 order.
14 (h) Relocation factors.--In determining whether to grant a
15 proposed relocation, the court shall consider the following
16 factors, giving weighted consideration to those factors which
17 affect the safety of the child:
18 (1) The nature, quality, extent of involvement and
19 duration of the child's relationship with the party proposing
20 to relocate and with the nonrelocating party, siblings and
21 other significant persons in the child's life.
22 (2) The age, developmental stage, needs of the child and
23 the likely impact the relocation will have on the child's
24 physical, educational and emotional development, taking into
25 consideration any special needs of the child.
26 (3) The feasibility of preserving the relationship
27 between the nonrelocating party and the child through
28 suitable custody arrangements, considering the logistics and
29 financial circumstances of the parties.
30 (4) The child's preference, taking into consideration
20250HB1699PN2087 - 7 -
1 the age and maturity of the child.
2 (5) Whether there is an established pattern of conduct
3 of either party to promote or thwart the relationship of the
4 child and the other party.
5 (6) Whether the relocation will enhance the general
6 quality of life for the party seeking the relocation,
7 including, but not limited to, financial or emotional benefit
8 or educational opportunity.
9 (7) Whether the relocation will enhance the general
10 quality of life for the child, including, but not limited to,
11 financial or emotional benefit or educational opportunity.
12 (8) The reasons and motivation of each party for seeking
13 or opposing the relocation.
14 (9) The present and past abuse committed by a party or
15 member of the party's household and whether there is a
16 continued risk of harm to the child or an abused party.
17 (10) Any other factor affecting the best interest of the
18 child.
19 (i) Burden of proof.--
20 (1) The party proposing the relocation has the burden of
21 establishing that the relocation will serve the best interest
22 of the child as shown under the factors set forth in
23 subsection (h).
24 (2) Each party has the burden of establishing the
25 integrity of that party's motives in either seeking the
26 relocation or seeking to prevent the relocation.
27 (j) Failure to provide reasonable notice.--The court may
28 consider a failure to provide reasonable notice of a proposed
29 relocation as:
30 (1) a factor in making a determination regarding the
20250HB1699PN2087 - 8 -
1 relocation;
2 (2) a factor in determining whether custody rights
3 should be modified;
4 (3) a basis for ordering the return of the child to the
5 nonrelocating party if the relocation has occurred without
6 reasonable notice;
7 (4) sufficient cause to order the party proposing the
8 relocation to pay reasonable expenses and counsel fees
9 incurred by the party objecting to the relocation; and
10 (5) a ground for contempt and the imposition of
11 sanctions against the party proposing the relocation.
12 (k) Mitigation.--Any consideration of a failure to provide
13 reasonable notice under subsection (i) shall be subject to
14 mitigation if the court determines that such failure was caused
15 in whole, or in part, by abuse.
16 (l) Effect of relocation prior to hearing.--If a party
17 relocates with the child prior to a full expedited hearing, the
18 court shall not confer any presumption in favor of the
19 relocation.]
20 Section 3. Title 23 is amended by adding a section to read:
21 § 5337.1. Relocation.
22 (a) Applicability.--This section applies to any proposed
23 relocation.
24 (b) Conditions.--A relocation may not occur unless the
25 relocating party has filed a custody complaint with request to
26 relocate, if there is not an existing custody action, or a
27 petition for relocation and modification, if there is an
28 existing custody action, and:
29 (1) every individual who has custody rights to the child
30 consents to the proposed relocation by written agreement; or
20250HB1699PN2087 - 9 -
1 (2) the court approves the proposed relocation.
2 (c) Service.--
3 (1) The relocating party shall serve the custody
4 complaint with request to relocate or the petition for
5 relocation and modification by original process.
6 (2) The custody complaint with request to relocate or
7 the petition for relocation and modification shall be served
8 no later than:
9 (i) the 60th day before the date of the proposed
10 relocation; or
11 (ii) the 10th day after the date that the relocating
12 party knows of the relocation, if:
13 (A) the relocating party did not know and could
14 not reasonably have known of the relocation in
15 sufficient time to comply with the 60-day
16 requirement; and
17 (B) it is not reasonably possible to delay the
18 date of relocation so as to comply with the 60-day
19 requirement.
20 (d) Contents.--
21 (1) Except as provided under section 5336 (relating to
22 access to records and information), the following
23 information, if available, must be included in the custody
24 complaint with request to relocate or the petition for
25 relocation and modification:
26 (i) A notice on the front of the document containing
27 a warning to the nonrelocating party that if the
28 nonrelocating party does not file an answer to the
29 custody complaint with request to relocate or the
30 petition for relocation and modification within 20 days
20250HB1699PN2087 - 10 -
1 after service of the custody complaint with request to
2 relocate or the petition for relocation and modification
3 with the court, the nonrelocating party shall be
4 foreclosed from objecting to the relocation.
5 (ii) The address of the intended new residence.
6 (iii) The mailing address, if not the same as the
7 address of the intended new residence.
8 (iv) Names and ages of the individuals in the new
9 residence, including individuals who intend to live in
10 the new residence.
11 (v) The home telephone number of the intended new
12 residence, if available.
13 (vi) The name of the new school district and school.
14 (vii) The date of the proposed relocation.
15 (viii) The reasons for the proposed relocation.
16 (ix) A proposal for a revised custody schedule.
17 (x) Any other information that the party proposing
18 the relocation deems appropriate.
19 (xi) All information regularly included in a custody
20 complaint in accordance with Pa.R.C.P. Nos. 1915.3
21 (relating to Commencement of Action. Complaint. Order)
22 and 1915.15 (relating to Form of Complaint. Caption.
23 Order. Petition to Modify a Custody Order) when filing a
24 custody complaint with request to relocate.
25 (2) If any of the information specified in paragraph (1)
26 is not known when the custody complaint with request to
27 relocate or the petition for relocation and modification is
28 filed with the court but later becomes known to the
29 relocating party, the relocating party shall promptly file an
30 amended custody complaint with request to relocate or an
20250HB1699PN2087 - 11 -
1 amended petition for relocation and modification with the
2 information included.
3 (e) Objection to proposed relocation.--
4 (1) If the nonrelocating party objects to the relocation
5 within 20 days of service of the custody complaint with
6 request to relocate or the petition for relocation and
7 modification, the nonrelocating party shall file an answer
8 objecting to the proposed relocation. If the nonrelocating
9 party objects to either relocation or modification of the
10 custody order, a full-factors hearing shall be held as
11 provided in accordance with subsection (f).
12 (2) If an answer objecting to the proposed relocation
13 has not been timely filed in court, it shall be presumed that
14 the nonrelocating party has consented to the proposed
15 relocation and the court shall enter an appropriate order.
16 (f) Expedited pretrial conference and hearing.--
17 (1) After the relocating party files a custody complaint
18 with request to relocate or a petition for relocation and
19 modification and an answer is filed, the court shall hold an
20 expedited pretrial conference. The court is encouraged to use
21 advanced technology, including video conferencing and
22 telephonic means, to enable the pretrial conference to occur
23 as quickly as possible. Ten days prior to the expedited
24 pretrial conference, the parties shall file pretrial
25 statements with the court, specifying a factual and
26 procedural history of the case and an analysis of the custody
27 factors and relocation factors.
28 (2) If an agreement is not reached at the pretrial
29 conference, the court shall hold a full-factors hearing on an
30 expedited basis.
20250HB1699PN2087 - 12 -
1 (3) If the court approves the proposed relocation, it
2 shall:
3 (i) modify any existing custody order; or
4 (ii) establish the terms and conditions of a custody
5 order.
6 (4) If the court does not approve the relocation, it
7 shall enter an appropriate order.
8 (g) Relocation factors.--In determining whether to grant a
9 proposed relocation, the court shall consider the following
10 factors, giving weighted consideration to those factors that
11 affect the safety of the child:
12 (1) The nature, quality, extent of involvement and
13 duration of the child's relationship with the relocating
14 party and with the nonrelocating party, siblings and other
15 significant individuals in the child's life.
16 (2) The age, developmental stage and needs of the child
17 and the likely impact that the relocation will have on the
18 child's physical, educational and emotional development,
19 taking into consideration any special needs of the child.
20 (3) The feasibility of preserving the relationship
21 between the nonrelocating party and the child through
22 suitable custody arrangements, considering the logistics and
23 financial circumstances of the parties.
24 (4) The child's preference, taking into consideration
25 the age and maturity of the child.
26 (5) Whether there is an established pattern of conduct
27 of either party to promote or thwart the relationship of the
28 child and the other party.
29 (6) Whether the relocation will enhance the general
30 quality of life for the relocating party, including financial
20250HB1699PN2087 - 13 -
1 or emotional benefit or educational opportunity.
2 (7) Whether the relocation will enhance the general
3 quality of life for the child, including financial or
4 emotional benefit or educational opportunity.
5 (8) The reasons and motivation of each party for seeking
6 or opposing the relocation.
7 (9) If applicable, the reason and motivation of the
8 relocating party for not filing a custody complaint with
9 request to relocate or a petition for relocation and
10 modification earlier to the extent that the reason and
11 motivation impacts the best interest of the child.
12 (10) The present and past abuse committed by a party or
13 member of the party's household and whether there is a
14 continued risk of harm to the child or an abused party.
15 (11) Any other factor affecting the best interest of the
16 child.
17 (h) Burden of proof.--
18 (1) The relocating party has the burden of establishing
19 that the relocation will serve the best interest of the child
20 as shown under the factors specified in subsection (g).
21 (2) Each party has the burden of establishing the
22 integrity of that party's motives in either seeking the
23 relocation or seeking to prevent the relocation.
24 (i) Failure to comply.--The court may consider a failure to
25 comply with this section as:
26 (1) a factor in making a determination regarding the
27 relocation;
28 (2) a factor in determining whether custody rights
29 should be modified;
30 (3) a basis for ordering the return of the child to the
20250HB1699PN2087 - 14 -
1 nonrelocating party if the relocation has occurred prior to
2 the filing of a custody complaint with request to relocate or
3 a petition for relocation and modification;
4 (4) sufficient cause to order the relocating party to
5 pay reasonable expenses and counsel fees incurred by the
6 nonrelocating party; and
7 (5) a ground for contempt and the imposition of
8 sanctions against the relocating party.
9 (j) Mitigation.--Any consideration of a failure to comply
10 with this section shall be subject to mitigation if the court
11 determines that the failure was caused, in whole or in part, by
12 abuse.
13 (k) Effect of relocation prior to hearing.--If a party
14 relocates with the child prior to a full expedited hearing, the
15 court shall not confer any presumption in favor of the
16 relocation.
17 Section 4. This act shall take effect in 60 days.
20250HB1699PN2087 - 15 -Connected on the graph
Outbound (1)
| date | type | to | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | referred_to_committee | Pennsylvania House Judiciary Committee | — | pa-leg |
The full graph
Every typed relationship touching this entity — 1 edge across 1 category. Grouped by what the connection is; the heaviest few are shown, with a link to the full list.
Committees
→ Referred to committee 1 edge
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Liz Hanbidge (D, state_lower PA-61) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 2 | Ben Waxman (D, state_lower PA-182) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 3 | Benjamin V. Sanchez (D, state_lower PA-153) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 4 | Carol Hill-Evans (D, state_lower PA-95) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 5 | Dan K. Williams (D, state_lower PA-74) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 6 | G. Roni Green (D, state_lower PA-190) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 7 | Jeanne McNeill (D, state_lower PA-133) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 8 | Kristine C. Howard (D, state_lower PA-167) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 9 | La'Tasha D. Mayes (D, state_lower PA-24) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 10 | Melissa Cerrato (D, state_lower PA-151) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 11 | Melissa L. Shusterman (D, state_lower PA-157) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 12 | Tim Briggs (D, state_lower PA-149) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no
Activity
Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.
- 2026-05-20 · was referred to Pennsylvania House Judiciary Committee · pa-leg