HB 1883 — An Act amending the act of March 10, 1949 (P.L.30, No.14), known as the Public School Code of 1949, in pupils and attendance, providing for chronic absence prevention and support.
Congress · introduced 2025-09-29
Latest action: — Referred to EDUCATION, Sept. 29, 2025
Sponsors
- Manuel Guzman (D, PA-127) — sponsor · 2025-09-29
- Carol Hill-Evans (D, PA-95) — cosponsor · 2025-09-29
- Jose Giral (D, PA-180) — cosponsor · 2025-09-29
- Benjamin V. Sanchez (D, PA-153) — cosponsor · 2025-09-29
- Keith S. Harris (D, PA-195) — cosponsor · 2025-09-29
- Dan K. Williams (D, PA-74) — cosponsor · 2025-09-29
Action timeline
- · house — Referred to EDUCATION, Sept. 29, 2025
Text versions
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Bill text
Printer's No. 2344 · 5,969 characters · source document
Read the full text
PRINTER'S NO. 2344
THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA
HOUSE BILL
No. 1883
Session of
2025
INTRODUCED BY GUZMAN, HILL-EVANS, GIRAL AND SANCHEZ,
SEPTEMBER 26, 2025
REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION, SEPTEMBER 29, 2025
AN ACT
1 Amending the act of March 10, 1949 (P.L.30, No.14), entitled "An
2 act relating to the public school system, including certain
3 provisions applicable as well to private and parochial
4 schools; amending, revising, consolidating and changing the
5 laws relating thereto," in pupils and attendance, providing
6 for chronic absence prevention and support.
7 The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
8 hereby enacts as follows:
9 Section 1. The act of March 10, 1949 (P.L.30, No.14), known
10 as the Public School Code of 1949, is amended by adding a
11 section to read:
12 Section 1333.5. Chronic Absence Prevention and Support.--(a)
13 Each school shall collect daily attendance data for each student
14 enrolled and report attendance using a standardized system to
15 the department in accordance with the following:
16 (1) Attendance data shall include all absences,
17 disaggregated by grade, student group and reason for absence,
18 categorized by the following:
19 (i) Satisfactory, meaning less than five percent (5%)
20 absent.
1 (ii) At-risk, meaning five percent (5%) to nine percent (9%)
2 absent.
3 (iii) Moderate, meaning ten percent (10%) to nineteen
4 percent (19%) absent.
5 (iv) Severe, meaning twenty percent (20%) or more absent.
6 (2) The department shall maintain a publicly accessible,
7 real-time attendance dashboard for educators, policymakers,
8 families and the public to ensure transparency and actionable
9 insights.
10 (3) The department shall produce an annual report
11 summarizing chronic absence trends, interventions implemented
12 and outcomes achieved across districts and schools.
13 (b) Each school shall establish an SAIP aligned with an MTSS
14 to address chronic absence through prevention, early
15 intervention and targeted support. Each SAIP shall include:
16 (1) Identification of students at risk of chronic absence.
17 (2) Tiered interventions, increasing in intensity based on
18 student needs.
19 (3) Coordination with counselors, social workers, teachers
20 and community partners.
21 (4) Monitoring of progress, outcomes and equity measures.
22 (c) An SAIP shall be developed collaboratively with
23 students, families of students and community stakeholders and
24 shall be reviewed at least twice per year.
25 (d) A school shall:
26 (1) Ensure that attendance interventions are culturally and
27 linguistically responsive, recognizing the diverse backgrounds
28 of students and families.
29 (2) Actively engage families in the development and
30 implementation of an SAIP, providing guidance and resources to
20250HB1883PN2344 - 2 -
1 address barriers to attendance.
2 (e) Additional support shall be provided to students from
3 historically marginalized or vulnerable populations, including
4 students of color, students with disabilities and students from
5 low-income backgrounds, to address disparities in chronic
6 absence.
7 (f) A school shall provide intervention and support
8 strategies in accordance with the following:
9 (1) Schools shall prioritize supportive, restorative and
10 preventive measures over punitive actions to improve attendance,
11 including mentoring, counseling, academic supports,
12 transportation assistance and connection to community services.
13 (2) Legal action or court involvement shall be used only as
14 a last resort, after all supportive interventions have been
15 exhausted and documented.
16 (g) A school shall provide recognition and resource
17 allocation in accordance with the following:
18 (1) Schools achieving meaningful reductions in chronic
19 absence shall be publicly recognized.
20 (2) The department shall use attendance data to target
21 resources and technical assistance to schools most in need of
22 support.
23 (h) The department shall provide implementation and
24 oversight in accordance with the following:
25 (1) The department shall provide guidance, training and
26 technical assistance to support districts and schools in
27 adopting best practices and implementing an SAIP aligned with
28 MTSS.
29 (2) The department shall monitor implementation, evaluate
30 effectiveness and recommend continuous improvements to the
20250HB1883PN2344 - 3 -
1 framework.
2 (i) As used in this section, the following words and phrases
3 shall have the meanings given to them in this subsection unless
4 the context clearly indicates otherwise:
5 "Chronic absence." A student missing ten percent (10%) or
6 more of enrolled school days in a school year for any reason,
7 including excused and unexcused absences.
8 "MTSS." A multitiered system of supports which is a
9 framework of evidence-based academic, behavioral and social-
10 emotional supports provided at increasing levels of intensity
11 based on student needs.
12 "SAIP." A school attendance improvement plan that a school
13 creates in accordance with this section designed to reduce
14 chronic absence and provide targeted supports.
15 Section 2. This act shall take effect in 60 days.
20250HB1883PN2344 - 4 -Connected on the graph
Outbound (1)
| date | type | to | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | referred_to_committee | Pennsylvania House Education Committee | — | pa-leg |
The full graph
Every typed relationship touching this entity — 1 edge across 1 category. Grouped by what the connection is; the heaviest few are shown, with a link to the full list.
Committees
→ Referred to committee 1 edge
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Manuel Guzman (D, state_lower PA-127) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 2 | Benjamin V. Sanchez (D, state_lower PA-153) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 3 | Carol Hill-Evans (D, state_lower PA-95) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 4 | Dan K. Williams (D, state_lower PA-74) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 5 | Jose Giral (D, state_lower PA-180) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 6 | Keith S. Harris (D, state_lower PA-195) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no
Activity
Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.
- 2026-05-20 · was referred to Pennsylvania House Education Committee · pa-leg