HB 1913 — An Act amending Title 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in particular rights and immunities, providing for permissible argument for damages.
Congress · introduced 2025-10-01
Latest action: — Referred to JUDICIARY, Oct. 1, 2025
Sponsors
- Tim Brennan (D, PA-29) — sponsor · 2025-10-01
- Carol Hill-Evans (D, PA-95) — cosponsor · 2025-10-01
- Ben Waxman (D, PA-182) — cosponsor · 2025-10-01
- Jim Prokopiak (D, PA-140) — cosponsor · 2025-10-01
- Keith S. Harris (D, PA-195) — cosponsor · 2025-10-01
- Nikki Rivera (D, PA-96) — cosponsor · 2025-10-01
- G. Roni Green (D, PA-190) — cosponsor · 2025-10-01
Action timeline
- · house — Referred to JUDICIARY, Oct. 1, 2025
Text versions
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Bill text
Printer's No. 2394 · 3,060 characters · source document
Read the full text
PRINTER'S NO. 2394
THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA
HOUSE BILL
No. 1913
Session of
2025
INTRODUCED BY BRENNAN, HILL-EVANS, WAXMAN, PROKOPIAK, K.HARRIS,
RIVERA AND GREEN, OCTOBER 1, 2025
REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY, OCTOBER 1, 2025
AN ACT
1 Amending Title 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure) of the
2 Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in particular rights and
3 immunities, providing for permissible argument for damages.
4 The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
5 hereby enacts as follows:
6 Section 1. Title 42 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated
7 Statutes is amended by adding a section to read:
8 § 8320.2. Permissible argument for damages.
9 (a) Permissible argument.--Except as provided under
10 subsection (b), in any civil action tried before a judge, jury
11 or other tribunal, an attorney may, during closing argument:
12 (1) Specifically argue to the judge, jury or other
13 tribunal in lump sums or by mathematical formula the amount
14 the attorney deems to be an appropriate award for all past
15 and future economic or noneconomic damages or both economic
16 and noneconomic damages claimed to be recoverable.
17 (2) On behalf of a defendant, argue to the judge, jury
18 or other tribunal that an award of any lesser amount is
1 appropriate if there is a finding of liability against the
2 defendant.
3 (b) Prior disclosure required.--A party may not argue a sum
4 as provided for under subsection (a) unless the party first
5 discloses to the court and opposing counsel that the party
6 intends to argue damages listed under subsection (a) prior to
7 the presentation of closing arguments.
8 (c) Jury instruction.--In a civil action tried before a
9 jury, when lump sums or mathematical formulas are argued during
10 closing arguments as provided for under subsection (a), the
11 trial court shall instruct the jury that the sums or
12 mathematical formulas argued are not evidence but only arguments
13 and that the determination of the amount of appropriate damages
14 to be awarded, if any, is solely for the jury's determination.
15 (d) Construction.--
16 (1) Nothing in this section shall be construed to
17 prevent a defendant from arguing that the facts and evidence
18 of the case support a finding of no liability.
19 (2) Notwithstanding subsection (b), arguments as to
20 appropriate amount of economic damages may be made without
21 notice to opposing counsel if evidence supporting economic
22 damages has been introduced at trial.
23 Section 2. This act shall take effect in 60 days.
20250HB1913PN2394 - 2 -Connected on the graph
Outbound (1)
| date | type | to | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | referred_to_committee | Pennsylvania House Judiciary Committee | — | pa-leg |
The full graph
Every typed relationship touching this entity — 1 edge across 1 category. Grouped by what the connection is; the heaviest few are shown, with a link to the full list.
Committees
→ Referred to committee 1 edge
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tim Brennan (D, state_lower PA-29) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 2 | Ben Waxman (D, state_lower PA-182) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 3 | Carol Hill-Evans (D, state_lower PA-95) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 4 | G. Roni Green (D, state_lower PA-190) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 5 | Jim Prokopiak (D, state_lower PA-140) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 6 | Keith S. Harris (D, state_lower PA-195) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 7 | Nikki Rivera (D, state_lower PA-96) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no
Activity
Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.
- 2026-05-20 · was referred to Pennsylvania House Judiciary Committee · pa-leg