HB 2216 — An Act amending Title 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in juvenile matters, providing for special immigrant juvenile status predicate orders.
Congress · introduced 2026-02-12
Latest action: — Referred to JUDICIARY, Feb. 12, 2026
Sponsors
- Tarah Probst (D, PA-189) — sponsor · 2026-02-12
- Carol Hill-Evans (D, PA-95) — cosponsor · 2026-02-12
- La'Tasha D. Mayes (D, PA-24) — cosponsor · 2026-02-12
- Ben Waxman (D, PA-182) — cosponsor · 2026-02-12
- Emily Kinkead (D, PA-20) — cosponsor · 2026-02-12
- Kristine C. Howard (D, PA-167) — cosponsor · 2026-02-12
- Nikki Rivera (D, PA-96) — cosponsor · 2026-02-12
- Benjamin V. Sanchez (D, PA-153) — cosponsor · 2026-02-12
- Joseph C. Hohenstein (D, PA-177) — cosponsor · 2026-02-12
- Dan K. Williams (D, PA-74) — cosponsor · 2026-02-12
- Anthony A. Bellmon (D, PA-203) — cosponsor · 2026-02-12
- G. Roni Green (D, PA-190) — cosponsor · 2026-02-12
- Heather Boyd (D, PA-163) — cosponsor · 2026-02-12
Action timeline
- · house — Referred to JUDICIARY, Feb. 12, 2026
Text versions
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Bill text
Printer's No. 2910 · 7,897 characters · source document
Read the full text
PRINTER'S NO. 2910
THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA
HOUSE BILL
No. 2216
Session of
2026
INTRODUCED BY PROBST, HILL-EVANS, MAYES, WAXMAN, KINKEAD,
HOWARD, RIVERA, SANCHEZ, HOHENSTEIN, D. WILLIAMS, BELLMON,
GREEN AND BOYD, FEBRUARY 11, 2026
REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY, FEBRUARY 12, 2026
AN ACT
1 Amending Title 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure) of the
2 Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in juvenile matters,
3 providing for special immigrant juvenile status predicate
4 orders.
5 The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
6 hereby enacts as follows:
7 Section 1. The General Assembly finds and declares as
8 follows:
9 (1) In 1990, the Congress of the United States created
10 an immigration visa category known as Special Immigrant
11 Juvenile Status, which extends protections to certain
12 vulnerable youth.
13 (2) Prior to seeking this Federal immigration visa, an
14 applicant must first be in possession of a state court order
15 containing certain factual determinations.
16 (3) Under the Federal statutory scheme, state courts do
17 not determine a youth's eligibility for Special Immigrant
18 Juvenile Status.
1 (4) Instead, state courts are tasked with making the
2 following predicate factual findings regarding a juvenile:
3 (i) Whether reunification of the juvenile with one
4 or both of the juvenile's parents is not viable due to
5 abuse, abandonment, neglect or similar basis under state
6 law.
7 (ii) Whether it would not be in the best interest of
8 the juvenile to be returned to the country of nationality
9 or last habitual residence of the juvenile or juvenile's
10 parent.
11 (5) Orders containing the factual determinations under
12 paragraph (4) are referred to as Special Immigrant Juvenile
13 Status Predicate Orders.
14 Section 2. Chapter 63 of Title 42 of the Pennsylvania
15 Consolidated Statutes is amended by adding a subchapter to read:
16 SUBCHAPTER H
17 SPECIAL IMMIGRANT JUVENILE STATUS PREDICATE ORDERS
18 Sec.
19 6391. Definitions.
20 6392. Jurisdiction.
21 6393. Nonviability of reunification.
22 6394. Best interest presumption.
23 6395. Burden of proof and production.
24 6396. Confidentiality.
25 6397. Sua sponte authority.
26 6398. Abuse of discretion.
27 6399. Service or notice.
28 § 6391. Definitions.
29 The following words and phrases when used in this subchapter
30 shall have the meanings given to them in this section unless the
20260HB2216PN2910 - 2 -
1 context clearly indicates otherwise:
2 "Juvenile." An individual under 21 years of age.
3 "Juvenile court." Orphans' court, custody court, juvenile
4 court or any other court having jurisdiction under the laws of
5 this Commonwealth to make determinations relevant to the well-
6 being, welfare or best interest of a juvenile.
7 "Predicate factual findings." The factual determinations
8 made by a juvenile court regarding a juvenile as to:
9 (1) Whether reunification of the juvenile with one or
10 both of the juvenile's parents is not viable due to abuse,
11 abandonment, neglect or similar basis under State law.
12 (2) Whether it would not be in the best interest of the
13 juvenile to be returned to the country of nationality or last
14 habitual residence of the juvenile or juvenile's parent.
15 "Predicate order." An order issued in connection with a
16 juvenile court proceeding containing the predicate factual
17 findings necessary to enable an immigrant juvenile to apply for
18 Special Immigrant Juvenile Status.
19 § 6392. Jurisdiction.
20 (a) Juvenile court authority.--A juvenile court shall have
21 jurisdiction to enter a predicate order regarding an individual
22 but only if the individual is a juvenile.
23 (b) Predicate factual findings.--
24 (1) The predicate factual findings regarding a juvenile
25 need not be made at the same time or contained in the same
26 order awarding custody, appointing a guardian, adjudicating a
27 juvenile dependent or delinquent or granting any other form
28 of protection to safeguard the well-being, welfare or best
29 interests of the juvenile.
30 (2) In making predicate factual findings, a juvenile
20260HB2216PN2910 - 3 -
1 court shall use the definitions of abandonment, abuse,
2 neglect and best interest routinely applied under the
3 relevant law of this Commonwealth.
4 § 6393. Nonviability of reunification.
5 If a juvenile court finds that a juvenile has been abandoned,
6 abused or neglected by one or both of the juvenile's parents,
7 the juvenile court shall issue a predicate order finding that
8 reunification of the juvenile with the juvenile's offending
9 parent or parents is not viable due to the abandonment, abuse or
10 neglect.
11 § 6394. Best interest presumption.
12 If a juvenile court awards custody, appoints a guardian,
13 adjudicates a juvenile dependent or delinquent or grants any
14 other form of protection to safeguard the well-being, welfare or
15 best interests of an immigrant juvenile, it shall be presumed
16 that it is not in the best interest of the juvenile to be
17 returned to the country of nationality or last habitual
18 residence of the juvenile or juvenile's parent.
19 § 6395. Burden of proof and production.
20 (a) Predicate orders.--The burden of proof for proving
21 necessary facts for predicate orders is preponderance of
22 evidence.
23 (b) Testimony of juvenile.--The testimony of a juvenile
24 standing alone, if deemed credible, is sufficient proof upon
25 which to issue a predicate order. The testimony of the juvenile
26 need not be supported by other evidence.
27 (c) Construction.--Nothing in this subchapter shall be
28 construed to create an increased burden of proof or production.
29 § 6396. Confidentiality.
30 Information regarding the immigration status of a juvenile
20260HB2216PN2910 - 4 -
1 and any parties involved in a juvenile court proceeding under
2 this subchapter shall be confidential to the extent not
3 otherwise protected by State confidentiality law.
4 § 6397. Sua sponte authority.
5 Nothing in this subchapter shall prevent a juvenile court
6 from issuing a predicate order sua sponte if there is a factual
7 basis for the predicate order.
8 § 6398. Abuse of discretion.
9 A juvenile court commits an abuse of discretion if the
10 juvenile court denies a party a meaningful opportunity to seek a
11 predicate order or refuses to issue a predicate order if there
12 is a factual basis for the predicate order.
13 § 6399. Service or notice.
14 In a case involving an allegation of abandonment of a
15 juvenile by a parent of the juvenile, the juvenile court may
16 excuse the necessity of effectuating service on or other notice
17 to the parent if the parent has abandoned the juvenile for a
18 period of at least six months.
19 Section 3. This act shall take effect in 60 days.
20260HB2216PN2910 - 5 -Connected on the graph
Outbound (1)
| date | type | to | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | referred_to_committee | Pennsylvania House Judiciary Committee | — | pa-leg |
The full graph
Every typed relationship touching this entity — 1 edge across 1 category. Grouped by what the connection is; the heaviest few are shown, with a link to the full list.
Committees
→ Referred to committee 1 edge
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tarah Probst (D, state_lower PA-189) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 2 | Anthony A. Bellmon (D, state_lower PA-203) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 3 | Ben Waxman (D, state_lower PA-182) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 4 | Benjamin V. Sanchez (D, state_lower PA-153) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 5 | Carol Hill-Evans (D, state_lower PA-95) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 6 | Dan K. Williams (D, state_lower PA-74) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 7 | Emily Kinkead (D, state_lower PA-20) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 8 | G. Roni Green (D, state_lower PA-190) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 9 | Heather Boyd (D, state_lower PA-163) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 10 | Joseph C. Hohenstein (D, state_lower PA-177) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 11 | Kristine C. Howard (D, state_lower PA-167) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 12 | La'Tasha D. Mayes (D, state_lower PA-24) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 13 | Nikki Rivera (D, state_lower PA-96) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no
Activity
Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.
- 2026-05-20 · was referred to Pennsylvania House Judiciary Committee · pa-leg