HB 2502 — An Act amending Title 23 (Domestic Relations) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in dissolution of marital status, further providing for decree of court.
Congress · introduced 2026-05-11
Latest action: — Referred to JUDICIARY, May 11, 2026
Sponsors
- Jason Ortitay (R, PA-46) — sponsor · 2026-05-11
- Anita ASTORINO Kulik (D, PA-45) — cosponsor · 2026-05-11
- Valerie S. Gaydos (R, PA-44) — cosponsor · 2026-05-11
- R. Lee James (R, PA-64) — cosponsor · 2026-05-11
- Andrew Kuzma (R, PA-39) — cosponsor · 2026-05-11
- Joe Ciresi (D, PA-146) — cosponsor · 2026-05-11
Action timeline
- · house — Referred to JUDICIARY, May 11, 2026
Text versions
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Bill text
Printer's No. 3388 · 3,692 characters · source document
Read the full text
PRINTER'S NO. 3388
THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA
HOUSE BILL
No. 2502
Session of
2026
INTRODUCED BY ORTITAY, KULIK, GAYDOS, JAMES, KUZMA AND CIRESI,
MAY 11, 2026
REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY, MAY 11, 2026
AN ACT
1 Amending Title 23 (Domestic Relations) of the Pennsylvania
2 Consolidated Statutes, in dissolution of marital status,
3 further providing for decree of court.
4 The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
5 hereby enacts as follows:
6 Section 1. Section 3323(c.1) of Title 23 of the Pennsylvania
7 Consolidated Statutes is amended to read:
8 § 3323. Decree of court.
9 * * *
10 (c.1) Bifurcation.--[With]
11 (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), with the
12 consent of both parties, the court may enter a decree of
13 divorce or annulment prior to the final determination and
14 disposition of the matters provided for in subsection (b) if
15 the court determines that doing so provides sufficient
16 economic protections for any minor children of the marriage.
17 In the absence of the consent of both parties, the court may
18 enter a decree of divorce or annulment prior to the final
1 determination and disposition of the matters provided for in
2 subsection (b) if:
3 [(1) grounds have been established as provided in
4 subsection (g); and
5 (2) the moving party has demonstrated that:
6 (i) compelling circumstances exist for the entry of
7 the decree of divorce or annulment; and
8 (ii) sufficient economic protections have been
9 provided for the other party and any minor children of
10 the marriage during the pendency of the disposition of
11 the matters provided for in subsection (b).]
12 (i) grounds have been established as provided in
13 subsection (g); and
14 (ii) the moving party has demonstrated that:
15 (A) compelling circumstances exist for the entry
16 of the decree of divorce or annulment; and
17 (B) sufficient economic protections have been
18 provided for the other party and any minor children
19 of the marriage during the pendency of the
20 disposition of the matters provided for in subsection
21 (b).
22 (2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the court shall have
23 the authority to enter a decree of divorce or annulment prior
24 to the final determination and disposition of all claims
25 raised in the complaint without the consent of both parties
26 and without a showing of compelling circumstances if any of
27 the following apply:
28 (i) A valid protection from abuse order has been
29 entered under Chapter 61 (relating to protection from
30 abuse) in which one party is the defendant and the other
20260HB2502PN3388 - 2 -
1 party is the plaintiff.
2 (ii) A party has been charged with or convicted of a
3 personal injury crime, as defined in section 103 of the
4 act of November 24, 1998 (P.L.882, No.111), known as the
5 Crime Victims Act, against the other party.
6 * * *
7 Section 2. This act shall take effect in 60 days.
20260HB2502PN3388 - 3 -Connected on the graph
Outbound (1)
| date | type | to | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | referred_to_committee | Pennsylvania House Judiciary Committee | — | pa-leg |
The full graph
Every typed relationship touching this entity — 1 edge across 1 category. Grouped by what the connection is; the heaviest few are shown, with a link to the full list.
Committees
→ Referred to committee 1 edge
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jason Ortitay (R, state_lower PA-46) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 2 | Andrew Kuzma (R, state_lower PA-39) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 3 | Anita ASTORINO Kulik (D, state_lower PA-45) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 4 | Joe Ciresi (D, state_lower PA-146) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 5 | R. Lee James (R, state_lower PA-64) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 6 | Valerie S. Gaydos (R, state_lower PA-44) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no
Activity
Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.
- 2026-05-20 · was referred to Pennsylvania House Judiciary Committee · pa-leg