pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HR 99A Concurrent Resolution directing the Joint State Government Commission to establish a bipartisan task force to study any consolidated or unconsolidated State statutes in the Pennsylvania Crimes Code, Judicial Code, Sentencing Code or elsewhere under which a term of imprisonment and other collateral consequences may be imposed in order to identify redundant, overlapping and inconsistent offenses, improper grading and gaps in criminal liability, out-of-date, antiquated, offensive or unenforceable language and to make recommendations to the General Assembly.

Congress · introduced 2025-03-03

Latest action: Reported as committed, June 30, 2025

Sponsors

Action timeline

  1. · house Referred to JUDICIARY, March 3, 2025
  2. · house Reported as committed, June 30, 2025

Text versions

No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.

Bill text

Printer's No. 0828 · 8,569 characters · source document

Read the full text
PRINTER'S NO.   828

                  THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA



           HOUSE RESOLUTION
              No. 99
                                             Session of
                                               2025

     INTRODUCED BY KINKEAD, HILL-EVANS, PIELLI, RABB, SANCHEZ,
        HOWARD, D. MILLER, D. WILLIAMS, WARREN, WEBSTER, CEPEDA-
        FREYTIZ, KHAN, MADDEN AND WAXMAN, MARCH 3, 2025

     REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY, MARCH 3, 2025


                         A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
 1   Directing the Joint State Government Commission to establish a
 2      bipartisan task force to study any consolidated or
 3      unconsolidated State statutes in the Pennsylvania Crimes
 4      Code, Judicial Code, Sentencing Code or elsewhere under which
 5      a term of imprisonment and other collateral consequences may
 6      be imposed in order to identify redundant, overlapping and
 7      inconsistent offenses, improper grading and gaps in criminal
 8      liability, out-of-date, antiquated, offensive or
 9      unenforceable language and to make recommendations to the
10      General Assembly.
11      WHEREAS, In 1972, the General Assembly enacted the Crimes
12   Code in Title 18 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes,
13   which contained 282 carefully considered offenses and
14   suboffenses; and
15      WHEREAS, Since the Crimes Code's enactment, it has expanded
16   more than fivefold and now contains more than 1,500 offenses and
17   suboffenses, the majority of which were created without a
18   thorough review of the entire Crimes Code; and
19      WHEREAS, According to a 2009 report on offense grading
20   jointly commissioned by the Judiciary Committee of the Senate
21   and the Judiciary Committee of the House of Representatives and
 1   authored by Professor Paul H. Robinson as well as the University
 2   of Pennsylvania's Criminal Law Research Group, this ad hoc
 3   expansion of the Crimes Code has resulted in a "system of
 4   offenses marked by irrational and contradictory grading
 5   differences, and offense grades that seriously conflict with the
 6   values of Pennsylvania residents" in addition to various
 7   overlapping and duplicative offenses; and
 8         WHEREAS, The addition of numerous new offenses and changes to
 9   the Crimes Code since the publication of the 2009 report has not
10   only exacerbated the issues identified in the report but has
11   also extended to new, inconsistent and outdated provisions in
12   our Commonwealth's Judicial Code and Sentencing Code, as well as
13   other statutes, consolidated or otherwise, for which a term of
14   imprisonment and other collateral consequences may be imposed;
15   and
16         WHEREAS, A rational crimes code with offenses that coincide
17   with the views of the residents of this Commonwealth, in
18   conjunction with a cohesive Sentencing Code and a consistent
19   Judicial Code, is necessary to build and sustain public trust in
20   the laws of this Commonwealth and in the interpretation of those
21   laws by the judiciary; and
22         WHEREAS, The ever-increasing size and scope of the Crimes
23   Code has made it difficult for legislators to identify and
24   remedy gaps in criminal liability within the Crimes Code; and
25         WHEREAS, The convoluted nature of the Crimes Code has also
26   made it difficult for residents to fully comprehend the offenses
27   and grades within the code; and
28         WHEREAS, This is contrary to the goal of the Crimes Code,
29   which is to provide the public with a clear and comprehensible
30   list of prohibited activities and their punishments; and

20250HR0099PN0828                    - 2 -
 1      WHEREAS, A cohesive and rational Crimes Code, Judicial Code
 2   and Sentencing Code would be advantageous for the residents of
 3   this Commonwealth and every constituency working within the
 4   criminal justice process as it would serve to reduce confusion
 5   and provide a consistent approach to crime and punishment and
 6   any attendant penalties contained in statutes that include
 7   offenses for which a term of imprisonment and other collateral
 8   consequences are possible outcomes; and
 9      WHEREAS, Eliminating or updating out-of-date, antiquated,
10   offensive or unenforceable language from all provisions of
11   Pennsylvania's Crimes Code, Judicial Code and Sentencing Code,
12   as well as any consolidated or unconsolidated statutes that
13   could result in imprisonment and other collateral consequences,
14   would finally modernize the language of our codes, thereby
15   ensuring that the State laws reflect the views of the residents
16   in this Commonwealth consistently and unequivocally; and
17      WHEREAS, The General Assembly should be knowledgeable about
18   the state and nature of the Crimes Code and aware of any
19   oversights, deficiencies and redundancies within the Code that
20   would best be resolved; therefore be it
21      RESOLVED (the Senate concurring), That the General Assembly
22   direct the Joint State Government Commission to establish a
23   bipartisan task force to study any consolidated or
24   unconsolidated State statutes in the Pennsylvania Crimes Code,
25   Judicial Code, Sentencing Code or elsewhere under which a term
26   of imprisonment and other collateral consequences may be imposed
27   in order to identify redundant, overlapping and inconsistent
28   offenses, improper grading and gaps in criminal liability, out-
29   of-date, antiquated, offensive or unenforceable language and to
30   make recommendations to the General Assembly; and be it further

20250HR0099PN0828                 - 3 -
 1      RESOLVED, That the task force consist of two members of the
 2   Senate, one appointed by the President pro tempore of the Senate
 3   and one appointed by the Minority Leader of the Senate, and two
 4   members of the House of Representatives, one appointed by the
 5   Speaker of the House of Representatives and one appointed by the
 6   Minority Leader of the House of Representatives; and be it
 7   further
 8      RESOLVED, That the Joint State Government Commission oversee
 9   the creation of an advisory committee to assist the task force
10   in conducting the study and making recommendations; and be it
11   further
12      RESOLVED, That the advisory committee shall have 30 members
13   appointed by the Governor with the consent and approval of the
14   task force, comprised of representatives from the Office of
15   Attorney General, the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and
16   Delinquency, the Pennsylvania Commission on Sentencing, the
17   Public Defender Association of Pennsylvania, the Pennsylvania
18   Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, the Pennsylvania
19   District Attorneys Association, the judiciary, law enforcement
20   agencies, private and public organizations involved in criminal
21   justice issues and additional members as the task force deems
22   appropriate; and be it further
23      RESOLVED, That the task force and advisory committee shall:
24             (1)   study the existing Crimes Code and any statutory
25      offenses or suboffenses outside of the Crimes Code under
26      which a term of imprisonment and other collateral
27      consequences may be imposed;
28             (2)   study the existing Judicial Code;
29             (3)   study the existing Sentencing Code;
30             (4)   identify redundant, overlapping and inconsistent

20250HR0099PN0828                     - 4 -
 1      offenses, irrational and improper grading and potential gaps
 2      in criminal liability;
 3          (5)     identify out-of-date, antiquated, offensive or
 4      unenforceable language from all provisions of Pennsylvania's
 5      Crimes Code, Judicial Code and Sentencing Code, as well as
 6      any consolidated or unconsolidated statutes that could result
 7      in imprisonment and other collateral consequences;
 8          (6)     make recommendations to the General Assembly
 9      regarding changes in statute to remedy any defects,
10      redundancies and shortcomings; and
11          (7)     make recommendations to the General Assembly
12      regarding updating antiquated, offensive or unenforceable
13      language;
14   and be it further
15      RESOLVED, That the task force report its findings and
16   recommendations to the General Assembly within two years of the
17   adoption of this resolution.




20250HR0099PN0828                    - 5 -

Connected on the graph

Outbound (1)

datetypetoamountrolesource
referred_to_committeePennsylvania House Judiciary Committeepa-leg

The full graph

Every typed relationship touching this entity — 1 edge across 1 category. Grouped by what the connection is; the heaviest few are shown, with a link to the full list.

Committees

Referred to committee 1 edge

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Emily Kinkead (D, state_lower PA-20)sponsor05
2Ben Waxman (D, state_lower PA-182)cosponsor01
3Benjamin V. Sanchez (D, state_lower PA-153)cosponsor01
4Carol Hill-Evans (D, state_lower PA-95)cosponsor01
5Chris Pielli (D, state_lower PA-156)cosponsor01
6Christopher M. Rabb (D, state_lower PA-200)cosponsor01
7Dan K. Williams (D, state_lower PA-74)cosponsor01
8Jen Mazzocco (D, state_lower PA-42)cosponsor01
9Joe Webster (D, state_lower PA-150)cosponsor01
10Johanny Cepeda-Freytiz (D, state_lower PA-129)cosponsor01
11Kristine C. Howard (D, state_lower PA-167)cosponsor01
12Maureen E. Madden (D, state_lower PA-115)cosponsor01
13Nikki Rivera (D, state_lower PA-96)cosponsor01
14Perry S. Warren (D, state_lower PA-31)cosponsor01
15Tarik Khan (D, state_lower PA-194)cosponsor01

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)

By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no

Activity

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.

  1. 2026-05-20 · was referred to Pennsylvania House Judiciary Committee · pa-leg

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page. Want to partner? Contact us.

Costs about $62/month to run — free to use.