SB 474 — An Act providing for zero-based budgeting relating to the Commonwealth's budget review.
Congress · introduced 2025-03-19
Latest action: — Laid on the table (Pursuant to Senate Rule 9), Oct. 6, 2025
Sponsors
- Kristin Phillips-Hill (R, PA-28) — sponsor · 2025-03-19
- Dawn W. Keefer (R, PA-31) — cosponsor · 2025-03-19
- Daniel Laughlin (R, PA-49) — cosponsor · 2025-03-19
- Cris Dush (R, PA-25) — cosponsor · 2025-03-19
- Greg Rothman (R, PA-34) — cosponsor · 2025-03-19
- Scott Hutchinson (R, PA-21) — cosponsor · 2025-03-19
- Jarrett Coleman (R, PA-16) — cosponsor · 2025-03-19
- Patrick J. Stefano (R, PA-32) — cosponsor · 2025-03-19
- Judy Ward (R, PA-30) — cosponsor · 2025-03-19
- Doug Mastriano (R, PA-33) — cosponsor · 2025-03-19
Action timeline
- · senate — Referred to FINANCE, March 19, 2025
- · senate — Reported as amended, June 24, 2025
- · senate — First consideration, June 24, 2025
- · senate — Laid on the table (Pursuant to Senate Rule 9), Oct. 6, 2025
Text versions
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Bill text
Printer's No. 0429 · 4,819 characters · source document
Read the full text
PRINTER'S NO. 429
THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA
SENATE BILL
No. 474
Session of
2025
INTRODUCED BY PHILLIPS-HILL, KEEFER, LAUGHLIN, DUSH, ROTHMAN,
HUTCHINSON, COLEMAN, STEFANO, J. WARD AND MASTRIANO,
MARCH 19, 2025
REFERRED TO FINANCE, MARCH 19, 2025
AN ACT
1 Providing for zero-based budgeting relating to the
2 Commonwealth's budget review.
3 The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
4 hereby enacts as follows:
5 Section 1. Short title.
6 This act shall be known and may be cited as the Commonwealth
7 Zero-Based Budgeting Act.
8 Section 2. Findings.
9 The General Assembly finds and declares as follows:
10 (1) The traditional method of budget development, which
11 relies upon incremental adjustments to expenditures made in
12 the previous financial period, insulates governmental
13 activities from the thorough fiscal review expected by
14 taxpaying citizens.
15 (2) New and changing demands for public services are met
16 through excessive budget growth rather than by pruning
17 obsolete programs and redirecting existing funds. Some
1 programs were established so long ago that the original
2 statutory basis has either been forgotten or is out of date.
3 In time the budget is driven by inertia rather than by clear
4 and defensible purposes.
5 (3) Zero-based budgeting is an effective way to manage
6 costs while maintaining a high level of service and to hold
7 the State accountable for each dollar it spends.
8 Section 3. Budget review.
9 (a) Review.--The Secretary of the Budget shall subject every
10 program in State government to zero-based budget review no less
11 often than once every five years. In order to implement this
12 schedule, approximately one-fifth of the budget shall be subject
13 to zero-based budgeting in each year beginning in 2026. In 2025,
14 the Governor shall submit a zero-based budget for agencies with
15 a cumulative total of expenditures of at least 20% of the
16 General Fund budget.
17 (b) Agency plan.--To accommodate zero-based budget review,
18 the Secretary of the Budget shall require agencies to prepare
19 and submit a zero-based budget plan in addition to any other
20 information that may be required by statute, rule or directive.
21 At a minimum, the plan shall contain the following information:
22 (1) A description of those discrete activities that
23 comprise the agency and a justification for the existence of
24 each agency and activity by reference to statute or other
25 legal authority.
26 (2) For each activity, a quantitative estimate of any
27 adverse impacts that could reasonably be expected should the
28 activity be discontinued, together with a full description of
29 the methods by which the adverse impact is estimated.
30 (3) For each activity, an itemized account of
20250SB0474PN0429 - 2 -
1 expenditures that would be required to maintain the activity
2 at the minimum level of service required by the statutory
3 authority, together with a concise statement of the quantity
4 and quality of services required at that minimum level.
5 (4) For each activity, an itemized account of
6 expenditures required to maintain the activity at current
7 levels of service, together with a concise statement of the
8 quantity and quality of services being provided.
9 (5) A ranking of all activities that shows the relative
10 contribution of each activity to the overall goals and
11 purposes of the agency at current service levels.
12 Section 4. Educational services.
13 Notwithstanding section 3, the following shall not be subject
14 to zero-based budget review within the Department of Education:
15 (1) Class size.
16 (2) School curriculum.
17 (3) Direct services offered to students by classroom
18 teachers in public schools. Examples of direct services are
19 teaching, coaching, library and media services and career
20 counseling services provided within the public school system.
21 Indirect services, including overhead costs, administrative
22 costs and support services, shall be subject to zero-based
23 budget review.
24 Section 5. Effective date.
25 This act shall take effect in 60 days.
20250SB0474PN0429 - 3 -Connected on the graph
Outbound (1)
| date | type | to | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | referred_to_committee | Pennsylvania Senate Finance Committee | — | pa-leg |
The full graph
Every typed relationship touching this entity — 1 edge across 1 category. Grouped by what the connection is; the heaviest few are shown, with a link to the full list.
Committees
→ Referred to committee 1 edge
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kristin Phillips-Hill (R, state_upper PA-28) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 2 | Cris Dush (R, state_upper PA-25) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 3 | Daniel Laughlin (R, state_upper PA-49) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 4 | Dawn W. Keefer (R, state_upper PA-31) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 5 | Doug Mastriano (R, state_upper PA-33) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 6 | Greg Rothman (R, state_upper PA-34) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 7 | Jarrett Coleman (R, state_upper PA-16) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 8 | Judy Ward (R, state_upper PA-30) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 9 | Patrick J. Stefano (R, state_upper PA-32) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 10 | Scott Hutchinson (R, state_upper PA-21) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no
Activity
Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.
- 2026-05-20 · was referred to Pennsylvania Senate Finance Committee · pa-leg