S 2208 — National Seafood Supply Act of 2023
Congress 118
Latest action: — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Sponsors (1)
- Sullivan, Dan (R, AK-S) — sponsor · 2023-06-22
Action timeline (2)
- — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
- · 10000 — Introduced in Senate
Text versions (1)
- Introduced in Senate · 2023-06-22 — open
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (1)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
- Trends in USDA Procurement of U.S. Food and Agricultural Products
R48141· Reports · 2024-07-25The U.S. government is a significant buyer of food and agricultural products. In FY2023, the U.S. government spent $7.7 billion on food and agricultural products across several federal agencies (including purchases using
Connected on the graph
2 typed relationships in the influence graph — 1 inbound, 1 outbound, grouped by type.
cited in report (1)
| date | dir | entity | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | → | R48141 | — | crs-report-relatedMaterials |
sponsor of bill (1)
| date | dir | entity | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-22 | ← | Sullivan, Dan | — | sponsor | sponsorship |
Who matters on this bill
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sullivan, Dan (R, senate AK) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
Who's influencing them
Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.
| # | Org | LDA filings | LDA spend | Donor employees | Employee donations | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | retired | 0 | $0 | 526 | $527,742 | $527,742 |
| 2 | self employed | 0 | $0 | 65 | $93,928 | $93,928 |
| 3 | self | 0 | $0 | 37 | $55,264 | $55,264 |
| 4 | homemaker | 0 | $0 | 21 | $46,230 | $46,230 |
| 5 | self-employed | 0 | $0 | 20 | $38,755 | $38,755 |
| 6 | echostar | 0 | $0 | 3 | $24,000 | $24,000 |
| 7 | blackstone | 0 | $0 | 2 | $21,000 | $21,000 |
| 8 | unemployed | 0 | $0 | 11 | $18,000 | $18,000 |
| 9 | castle harlan, inc. | 0 | $0 | 1 | $17,500 | $17,500 |
| 10 | kirkland & ellis llp | 0 | $0 | 4 | $17,500 | $17,500 |
| 11 | apollo | 0 | $0 | 6 | $17,300 | $17,300 |
| 12 | whitecase llp | 0 | $0 | 1 | $16,000 | $16,000 |
| 13 | apollo global management | 0 | $0 | 5 | $14,900 | $14,900 |
| 14 | white case llp | 0 | $0 | 3 | $14,520 | $14,520 |
| 15 | haslam sports group | 0 | $0 | 2 | $14,000 | $14,000 |
| 16 | gci | 0 | $0 | 7 | $13,541 | $13,541 |
| 17 | corecivic | 0 | $0 | 5 | $13,105 | $13,105 |
| 18 | wilmerhale | 0 | $0 | 7 | $12,005 | $12,005 |
| 19 | rpm international inc. | 0 | $0 | 3 | $11,750 | $11,750 |
| 20 | aleut | 0 | $0 | 3 | $11,250 | $11,250 |
| 21 | not employed | 0 | $0 | 7 | $11,250 | $11,250 |
| 22 | monument advocacy | 0 | $0 | 3 | $11,000 | $11,000 |
| 23 | the roosevelt group | 0 | $0 | 2 | $11,000 | $11,000 |
| 24 | katmai government services | 0 | $0 | 3 | $10,505 | $10,505 |
| 25 | cumberland development | 0 | $0 | 1 | $10,500 | $10,500 |
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
1 predicted yes (0%) · 266 predicted no (49%) · 276 unknown (51%)
By party: · R: 1 yes / 0 no / 276 unknown · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no
1 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor)
- Sullivan, Dan (R · senate · AK) · sponsor
Timeline
Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; the inline strip under the row shows the counterpart's own context (a bill's latest action, a hearing's chamber + date, a filing's form type + filed date, a clip's source + excerpt) so the timeline reads like a Wikipedia citation rail.
- 2026-05-25 · Cited in GAO report R48141 · crs-report-relatedMaterials
- 2023-06-22 · sponsored by Sullivan, Dan (sponsor) · sponsorship