browse Browse

pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

S 2526Fight for the American Dream Act

Congress 119 · introduced 2025-07-29

Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Sponsors (2)
Action timeline (2)
  1. Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
  2. · 10000 Introduced in Senate
Text versions (1)
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (1)

CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.

Connected on the graph

4 typed relationships in the influence graph — 2 inbound, 2 outbound, grouped by type.

cosponsor of bill (2)
datedirentityamountrolesource
Fetterman, Johncosponsorsponsorship
Kelly, Markcosponsorsponsorship
cited in report (1)
datedirentityamountrolesource
R48163crs-report-relatedMaterials
referred to committee (1)
datedirentityamountrolesource
2025-01-03Senate Judiciary Committeecongress-committee
Who matters on this bill

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Kelly, Mark (D, senate AZ)cosponsor23
2Fetterman, John (D, senate PA)cosponsor01

Who's influencing them

Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.

#OrgLDA filingsLDA spendDonor employeesEmployee donationsTotal
1not employed0$027,824$8,118,550$8,118,550
2self employed0$02,300$845,832$845,832
3retired0$0327$182,720$182,720
4robbins geller rudman and dowd llp0$04$24,000$24,000
5self0$015$16,125$16,125
6g.g. greene enterprises, inc.0$01$14,000$14,000
7mass general hospital0$02$13,750$13,750
8the wonderful company0$02$13,200$13,200
9tilebar0$02$11,600$11,600
10marian, inc.0$01$11,500$11,500
11google0$020$11,391$11,391
12university of arizona0$038$10,834$10,834
13icg0$01$10,500$10,500
14field hands productions0$01$10,500$10,500
15flagship pioneering0$01$10,250$10,250
16transdigm group0$02$10,000$10,000
17concord servicing corp.0$01$10,000$10,000
18reglagene, inc.0$01$10,000$10,000
19meredith management0$02$9,000$9,000
20grossman company properties0$02$8,850$8,850
21arizona state university0$021$7,872$7,872
22slogoods properties, llc0$01$7,400$7,400
23northwestern university0$03$7,240$7,240
24covenant house0$01$7,000$7,000
25blue sky basin0$01$7,000$7,000
Stance (positions taken)

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

2 predicted yes (0%) · 280 predicted no (52%) · 261 unknown (48%)

By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 2 yes / 0 no / 261 unknown · I: 0 yes / 3 no

2 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor)
Timeline

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; the inline strip under the row shows the counterpart's own context (a bill's latest action, a hearing's chamber + date, a filing's form type + filed date, a clip's source + excerpt) so the timeline reads like a Wikipedia citation rail.

  1. 2026-05-23 · Cited in GAO report R48163 · crs-report-relatedMaterials
  2. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Fetterman, John (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  3. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Kelly, Mark (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  4. 2025-01-03 · was referred to Senate Judiciary Committee · congress-committee
News clips about this bill
Mentioned in /ask threads

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.