S 883 — New Deal for New Americans Act of 2023
Congress 118
Latest action: — Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Sponsors (1)
- Warren, Elizabeth (D, MA-S) — cosponsor
Action timeline (2)
- — Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- · 10000 — Introduced in Senate
Text versions (1)
- Introduced in Senate · 2023-03-21 — open
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (1)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
- Voter Registration Records and List Maintenance for Federal Elections
R46943· Reports · 2026-05-19Each state except North Dakota requires voter registration as a prerequisite for voting in federal elections. The accuracy of voter registration records is often considered important for election administration, as these
Connected on the graph
2 typed relationships in the influence graph — 1 inbound, 1 outbound, grouped by type.
cited in report (1)
| date | dir | entity | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | → | R46943 | — | crs-report-relatedMaterials |
cosponsor of bill (1)
| date | dir | entity | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | ← | Warren, Elizabeth | — | cosponsor | sponsorship |
Who matters on this bill
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Warren, Elizabeth (D, senate MA) | cosponsor | 6 | — | 6 |
Who's influencing them
Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.
| # | Org | LDA filings | LDA spend | Donor employees | Employee donations | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | none | 0 | $0 | 2,321 | $678,436 | $678,436 |
| 2 | self employed | 0 | $0 | 293 | $83,883 | $83,883 |
| 3 | retired | 0 | $0 | 149 | $44,101 | $44,101 |
| 4 | scaled agile inc. | 0 | $0 | 1 | $5,000 | $5,000 |
| 5 | conrad llc | 0 | $0 | 1 | $3,500 | $3,500 |
| 6 | american national corporation | 0 | $0 | 1 | $3,300 | $3,300 |
| 7 | mit/harvard | 0 | $0 | 1 | $3,008 | $3,008 |
| 8 | university of pennsylvania | 0 | $0 | 3 | $2,990 | $2,990 |
| 9 | smithsonian astrophysical observatory | 0 | $0 | 2 | $2,366 | $2,366 |
| 10 | synergy financial llc | 0 | $0 | 1 | $2,000 | $2,000 |
| 11 | william h thomas jr | 0 | $0 | 1 | $1,776 | $1,776 |
| 12 | intel | 0 | $0 | 2 | $1,625 | $1,625 |
| 13 | sasaki assoc. | 0 | $0 | 1 | $1,500 | $1,500 |
| 14 | trudeau & mcavoy | 0 | $0 | 1 | $1,500 | $1,500 |
| 15 | arctic slope research corp | 0 | $0 | 1 | $1,500 | $1,500 |
| 16 | life support technologies group | 0 | $0 | 1 | $1,400 | $1,400 |
| 17 | stanford university | 0 | $0 | 2 | $1,390 | $1,390 |
| 18 | 0 | $0 | 6 | $1,355 | $1,355 | |
| 19 | stanford univ | 0 | $0 | 1 | $1,350 | $1,350 |
| 20 | winifred dooley | 0 | $0 | 1 | $1,325 | $1,325 |
| 21 | los angeles community college district | 0 | $0 | 1 | $1,318 | $1,318 |
| 22 | university of washington | 0 | $0 | 4 | $1,252 | $1,252 |
| 23 | blooming nursery inc | 0 | $0 | 1 | $1,231 | $1,231 |
| 24 | land iq llc | 0 | $0 | 1 | $1,200 | $1,200 |
| 25 | ent associates | 0 | $0 | 1 | $1,200 | $1,200 |
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
1 predicted yes (0%) · 280 predicted no (52%) · 262 unknown (48%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 1 yes / 0 no / 262 unknown · I: 0 yes / 3 no
1 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor)
- Warren, Elizabeth (D · senate · MA) · cosponsor
Timeline
Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; the inline strip under the row shows the counterpart's own context (a bill's latest action, a hearing's chamber + date, a filing's form type + filed date, a clip's source + excerpt) so the timeline reads like a Wikipedia citation rail.
- 2026-05-23 · Cited in GAO report R46943 · crs-report-relatedMaterials
- 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Warren, Elizabeth (cosponsor) · sponsorship