HB 166 — AN ACT relating to public health and safety; amending provisions related to the scheduling and use of marijuana; repealing a conflicting provision; making conforming amendments; requiring rulemaking; and providing for an effective date.
WY 2026 session · introduced 2026-02-13
Latest action: 2026-02-13 — H Did not Consider for Introduction
Sponsors (5)
- Karlee Provenza (D, WY-45) — sponsor · 2026-02-13
- Ivan Posey (D, WY-33) — cosponsor · 2026-02-13
- Daniel Singh (R, WY-61) — cosponsor · 2026-02-13
- Cale Case (R, WY-25) — cosponsor · 2026-02-13
- Chris Rothfuss (D, WY-9) — cosponsor · 2026-02-13
Action timeline (3)
- · house · House — H Received for Introduction
- · LSO — Bill Number Assigned
- · house · House — H Did not Consider for Introduction
Text versions (0)
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
No CRS reports cite this bill yet.
Who matters on this bill
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Karlee Provenza (D, state_lower WY-45) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 2 | Cale Case (R, state_upper WY-25) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 3 | Chris Rothfuss (D, state_upper WY-9) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 4 | Daniel Singh (R, state_lower WY-61) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 5 | Ivan Posey (D, state_lower WY-33) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no