HJ 6 — A JOINT RESOLUTION to amend the Wyoming Constitution to provide for the election of judges and justices and to repeal conflicting constitutional provisions concerning the selection and retention of judges and justices.
WY 2026 session · introduced 2026-02-13
Latest action: 2026-02-13 — H Did not Consider for Introduction
Sponsors (5)
- Mike Schmid (R, WY-20) — sponsor · 2026-02-13
- Marlene Brady (R, WY-60) — cosponsor · 2026-02-13
- Gary Brown (R, WY-41) — cosponsor · 2026-02-13
- Paul Hoeft (R, WY-25) — cosponsor · 2026-02-13
- Darin McCann (R, WY-48) — cosponsor · 2026-02-13
Action timeline (3)
- · LSO — Bill Number Assigned
- · house · House — H Received for Introduction
- · house · House — H Did not Consider for Introduction
Text versions (0)
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
No CRS reports cite this bill yet.
Who matters on this bill
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mike Schmid (R, state_lower WY-20) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 2 | Darin McCann (R, state_lower WY-48) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 3 | Gary Brown (R, state_lower WY-41) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 4 | Marlene Brady (R, state_lower WY-60) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 5 | Paul Hoeft (R, state_lower WY-25) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no