SF 42 — AN ACT relating to counties; amending and clarifying the authority for counties to implement zoning regulations for specified purposes; amending the ability of counties to enact zoning resolutions associated to the extraction and production of specified minerals; making conforming amendments; specifying applicability; and providing for an effective date.
WY 2026 session · introduced 2026-02-10
Latest action: 2026-02-10 — S Failed Introduction 18-12-1-0-0
Sponsors (5)
- Mike Gierau (D, WY-17) — sponsor · 2026-02-10
- Andrew Byron (R, WY-22) — cosponsor · 2026-02-10
- Elissa Campbell (R, WY-56) — cosponsor · 2026-02-10
- Steve Harshman (R, WY-37) — cosponsor · 2026-02-10
- Jim Anderson (R, WY-28) — cosponsor · 2026-02-10
Action timeline (3)
- · LSO — Bill Number Assigned
- · senate · Senate — S Received for Introduction
- · senate · Senate — S Failed Introduction 18-12-1-0-0
Text versions (0)
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
No CRS reports cite this bill yet.
Who matters on this bill
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mike Gierau (D, state_upper WY-17) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 2 | Andrew Byron (R, state_lower WY-22) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 3 | Elissa Campbell (R, state_lower WY-56) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 4 | Jim Anderson (R, state_upper WY-28) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 5 | Steve Harshman (R, state_lower WY-37) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no