browse Browse

pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

SF 93AN ACT relating to domestic relations; amending considerations for determining the child's best interests for custody matters; specifying requirements for shared custody considerations for child custody dispositions; providing definitions; requiring court findings for specified child custody dispositions; making conforming amendments; specifying applicability; and providing for an effective date.

WY 2026 session · introduced 2026-02-11

Latest action: 2026-02-11 S Failed Introduction 19-12-0-0-0

Sponsors (12)
Action timeline (3)
  1. · LSO Bill Number Assigned
  2. · senate · Senate S Received for Introduction
  3. · senate · Senate S Failed Introduction 19-12-0-0-0
Text versions (0)

No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.

Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)

CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.

No CRS reports cite this bill yet.

Who matters on this bill

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Laura Pearson (R, state_upper WY-14)sponsor05
2Ann Lucas (R, state_lower WY-43)cosponsor01
3Brian Boner (R, state_upper WY-2)cosponsor01
4Cheri Steinmetz (R, state_upper WY-3)cosponsor01
5Daniel Singh (R, state_lower WY-61)cosponsor01
6Darin McCann (R, state_lower WY-48)cosponsor01
7Lynn Hutchings (R, state_upper WY-5)cosponsor01
8Mike Schmid (R, state_lower WY-20)cosponsor01
9Ocean Andrew (R, state_lower WY-46)cosponsor01
10Robert Wharff (R, state_lower WY-49)cosponsor01
11Scott Heiner (R, state_lower WY-18)cosponsor01
12Scott Smith (R, state_lower WY-5)cosponsor01
Stance (positions taken)

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)

By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no

Timeline
News clips about this bill
Mentioned in /ask threads

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.