pac.dog pac.dog / Clips

YOSEMITE BELONGS TO THE PEOPLE

Speaker
M001177
Subject
M001177
Source
Congressional Record · original
Chamber
house
Published
Wednesday, March 5, 2025

Sign in to add to a watchlist →

Congressional Record, Volume 171 Issue 42 (Wednesday, March 5, 2025) [Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 42 (Wednesday, March 5, 2025)] [House] [Page H980] From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [ www.gpo.gov ] YOSEMITE BELONGS TO THE PEOPLE (Mr. McClintock of California was recognized to address the House for 5 minutes.) Mr. McCLINTOCK. Mr. Speaker, a well-known bureaucratic response to any attempt to reduce government spending is called the Washington Monument strategy. If anybody suggests cutting the budget, then just shut down the Washington Monument until enough tourists complain to their Congressman. We saw this strategy implemented with a vengeance during the government shutdown under Obama. All reservations at the national parks were canc…

Full text

5,023 chars

Congressional Record, Volume 171 Issue 42 (Wednesday, March 5, 2025) [Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 42 (Wednesday, March 5, 2025)] [House] [Page H980] From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [ www.gpo.gov ] YOSEMITE BELONGS TO THE PEOPLE (Mr. McClintock of California was recognized to address the House for 5 minutes.) Mr. McCLINTOCK. Mr. Speaker, a well-known bureaucratic response to any attempt to reduce government spending is called the Washington Monument strategy. If anybody suggests cutting the budget, then just shut down the Washington Monument until enough tourists complain to their Congressman. We saw this strategy implemented with a vengeance during the government shutdown under Obama. All reservations at the national parks were canceled. Vendors were ordered to close, perishable deliveries were turned back, The National Mall was cordoned off, gates to the national parks were chained, and even highway turnouts with a view of Yosemite Valley were barricaded. Now, compare that to the government shutdown in the first Trump administration. Vendors remained in business, the public lands remained fully open to the public, no monuments were obstructed, no barricades were erected, and the gates to the national parks remained fully accessible. Today, opponents of President Trump's war on government waste have revived the Washington Monument strategy to maintain a bloated Federal workforce that is crushing American taxpayers. Every dollar of discretionary spending, which fully or partially funds every department within the Federal Government, is now borrowed. Instead of long-overdue streamlining, the Democrats are pushing for a tax increase that will amount to about $1,500 on a family earning just $75,000. At Yosemite National Park, in my district, disgruntled employees hung a giant American flag upside-down on El Capitan the other day, ruining the view for tourists who came to enjoy Yosemite's famous firefall. Remote cameras at the park are now blocked by protest signs. A Yosemite biologist told gullible reporters that the staff cuts would doom the Sierra Nevada red fox to extinction. Others warned that layoffs would result in visitors stuck in restrooms and fires raging out of control. This is human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together, mass hysteria, as a ``Ghostbusters'' character once put it. What is the actual number of layoffs at Yosemite National Park that will bring the beautiful valley to rack and ruin? Mr. Speaker, 10, the number is 10 probationary employees, 10 out of nearly 500 full-time winter employees, 25 if you include early retirements and no firefighters. This begs some important questions: Is the park so poorly managed that only one employee has keys to the restrooms serving the 748,000- acre national park? Apparently. {time} 1015 How will the Sierra Nevada red fox survive with only eight remaining biologists at Yosemite looking out for it rather than nine? I guess we will just have to find out. How many of Yosemite's employees are working from home? We don't know because the park management won't tell us. We do know that 34 percent of National Park Service employees across the country were still working from home in 2023. Need to find the nearest unlocked restroom? Just email them. Indeed, the employees who provide most of the visitor amenities, such as the hotels, shops, and restaurants, don't even work for the Park Service. They work for the park's private concessionaire. It is true that hiring seasonal employees was delayed for a few weeks when the administration put a temporary hold on new hires, but that hold was soon lifted. These positions will actually increase by about 50. More than a decade ago, when I first met with park management, I noticed a placard in the conference room. It read: Is it good for the park? I suggested that was the wrong question. The right question is: Is it good for the park's visitors? It is a matter of attitude. The Yosemite Grant Act of 1864 was the first time that land was set aside for the use, resort, and recreation of the American people. It says nothing about the park's employees. They work for the people, who, in turn, have selected Donald Trump to exercise the executive powers of the government and charged him to take care that the laws be faithfully executed. He can't do that if he can't open the books, look at where the money is spent, and determine whether it is being spent efficiently and in accordance with the law or stop it when it isn't. The antics of some of Yosemite's employees dishonor the silent majority at the park, who are genuinely devoted to public service. As Hamilton said: ``Here, sir, the people govern.'' All 2.4 million employees in the Federal workforce exercise powers delegated by the President through our Constitution by virtue of his election. Any Federal employee who doesn't respect the authority of the people and the President they elected has no business working for them. ____________________

Related clips (by topic)

Closest matches by cosine similarity over the clip embedding index — semantically related coverage even when the speaker or subject differs.

More from this speaker

More on this subject

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.

Estimated value: $180/mo per user — but we made it free.