pac.dog pac.dog / Clips

netscape.com: https://isp.netscape.com:443/news/world/story/0001/20260519/7984e25ec34a9f4a11a97cb7b6b0411f

Speaker
—
Subject
CA-LEG-A24-LEE
Source
GDELT news · original
Published
Tuesday, May 19, 2026

Sign in to add to a watchlist →

Judge Alex Lee, one of the three government-vetted judges, said that they hoped to deliver a verdict in July for Chow Hang-tung and Lee Cheuk-yan, two former leaders of the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China.

Full text

3,000 chars

Hong Kong court hears final arguments in trial of Tiananmen vigil organizers, hopes for July verdict - Netscape News Netscape Internet Service World News News Home U.S. World Entertainment Money Politics Sports Science Health Odd News Hong Kong court hears final arguments in trial of Tiananmen vigil organizers, hopes for July verdict By KANIS LEUNG Associated Press HONG KONG (AP) — A Hong Kong court on Tuesday concluded final arguments in a national security trial for two former organizers of the city's vigils remembering the 1989 Tiananmen Square crackdown . Judge Alex Lee, one of the three government-vetted judges, said that they hoped to deliver a verdict in July for Chow Hang-tung and Lee Cheuk-yan, two former leaders of the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China. For decades, the now-defunct alliance organized the only large-scale public commemoration in China that attracted tens of thousands annually until the event was banned in 2020 during the first year of the coronavirus pandemic. Chow and Lee were charged in 2021 with inciting subversion under a Beijing-imposed national security law, facing a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison if convicted. They pleaded not guilty in January. Observers say their prosecution and the disappearance of the vigil symbolized the decline in freedoms that Beijing had promised when the former British colony returned to Chinese rule in 1997. The Hong Kong and Beijing governments said that the security law is crucial for the city's stability. In previous hearings, the prosecution has focused on “ending one-party rule,” one of the alliance’s core demands, arguing that the group’s advocacy was about inciting others to use unlawful means to overthrow the leadership of China’s ruling Communist Party. Chow, a barrister who defended herself, said Tuesday that her trial was a “very strange case,” because the defendants neither denied anything they had done nor argued that what they said didn't reflect their thoughts. Chow said that “ending one-party rule” means ending a state where power is unrestricted, and that a key question in the case is whether the law is really safeguarding the Chinese Communist Party to rule forever and banning the people from pushing forward democratization. Chow argued that the standard for determining right and wrong has been turned upside down in this case. “Speaking the truth has become inciting hatred, seeking justice has become exploiting suffering, limiting power has become violating the constitution, and returning power to the people has become subverting the state,” she said. She said what is on trial is the law itself, adding that if the court fails to gatekeep over the reasonable effects of their statements, it could easily become an accomplice by tolerating the crimes committed by those in power. The prosecution said Monday that freedoms of speech, assembly and as

More on this subject

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page. Want to partner? Contact us.

Estimated value: $540/mo per user — but we made it free.