STOREY COUNTY

Related entities (19)

Same brand-name cluster — possible parent, subsidiary, PAC, or lobbying registration. Surfaced via head-token match (e.g. every "AMAZON …" org) and pg_trgm similarity for variant spellings. Not yet asserted as parent/child edges; treat as a navigation aid.

• STOREY & ROSS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEEpac · head-token 0.85
• Storey County Chamber Of Commercenonprofit · head-token 0.85
• Storey County Chamber Of Commercenonprofit · head-token 0.85
• STOREY FOR CAPITOLA CITY COUNCIL 2018; SAMcommittee · head-token 0.85
• STOREY FOR CAPITOLA CITY COUNCIL, SAMcommittee · head-token 0.85
• STOREY FOR CAPITOLA COUNCIL 2016; SAMcommittee · head-token 0.85
• STOREY FOR CLERK/RECORDER 2010committee · head-token 0.85
• STOREY FOR JUDGE 2018; ANGELAcommittee · head-token 0.85
• STOREY FOR SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE #3 2018committee · head-token 0.85
• STOREY TO CAPITOLA CITY COUNCIL 2010, COMMITTEE TO RE-ELECT SAMcommittee · head-token 0.85
• ST. JOHN'S COUNTYlobbying_client · trigram 0.43
• county attorneypublic_office · trigram 0.43
• Scott Countynonprofit · trigram 0.42
• BI-COUNTY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEEpac · trigram 0.41
• COOK COUNTYlobbying_client · trigram 0.41
• COOS COUNTYlobbying_client · trigram 0.41
• SONOMA COUNTYlobbying_client · trigram 0.40
• RAMSEY COUNTYemployer · trigram 0.40
• SENECA COUNTYemployer · trigram 0.40

Activity

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.

1. 2026-05-18 · lobbied by Bradley Solyan · lda_lobbyist_client
2. 2026-05-18 · lobbied by Jon C Porter Sr · lda_lobbyist_client
3. 2026-05-18 · lobbied by Brian Bates · lda_lobbyist_client
4. 2026-05-18 · lobbied by J Chris Porter Jr · lda_lobbyist_client
5. 2026-01-01 · lobbied for by PORTER GROUP, LLC $40,000 · lda_filing

Lobbying disclosures — as CLIENT (1)

Filings where this org hired a lobbying firm. Income + expenses come from the LDA disclosure.

Aliases (1)

Connected on the graph

5 typed relationships in the influence graph — 5 inbound, 0 outbound, grouped by type.

The full graph

Every typed relationship touching this entity — 5 edges across 1 category. Grouped by what the connection is; the heaviest few are shown, with a link to the full list.