SANTORO FOR CONGRESS CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE

Related entities (24)

Same brand-name cluster — possible parent, subsidiary, PAC, or lobbying registration. Surfaced via head-token match (e.g. every "AMAZON …" org) and pg_trgm similarity for variant spellings. Not yet asserted as parent/child edges; treat as a navigation aid.

• SANTORO FOR CITY COUNCIL 2011, JOEcommittee · head-token 0.85
• SANTORO FOR CITY COUNCIL 2015, JOEcommittee · head-token 0.85
• SANTORO FOR CITY COUNCIL, MARKcommittee · head-token 0.85
• SARACENI, CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE FORcommittee · trigram 0.55
• CANTO FOR COUNCIL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEEcommittee · trigram 0.53
• QUIGG FOR CONGRESS CAMPAIGN COMMITTEcommittee · trigram 0.52
• CONGER CAMPAIGN COMMITTEEcommittee · trigram 0.50
• FORD CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE (FCC)committee · trigram 0.50
• SONG CAMPAIGN COMMITTEEcommittee · trigram 0.50
• PETERSON FOR CONGRESS CAMPAIGN COMMITEEcommittee · trigram 0.49
• RO FOR CONGRESS - CALIFORNIA COMMITTEEcommittee · trigram 0.49
• COMMITTEE FOR CAMPAIGN HONESTYcommittee · trigram 0.49
• SIBBACH FOR AUDITOR CAMPAIGN COMMITTEEcommittee · trigram 0.48
• SKOLA FOR SCHOOL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEEcommittee · trigram 0.48
• HEMPEL FOR CONGRESS CAMPAIGN COMMTTEEcommittee · trigram 0.48
• SMITH FOR CONGRESS COMMITTEE, DAVEcommittee · trigram 0.48
• YES FOR KIDS CAMPAIGN COMMITTEEcommittee · trigram 0.48
• FORBES CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE, EDcommittee · trigram 0.48
• FOSTER CAMPAIGN COMMITTEEcommittee · trigram 0.48
• SAMPSON CAMPAIGN COMMITTEEcommittee · trigram 0.48
• MINOR FOR CORONER CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE, STANcommittee · trigram 0.47
• STOLTZ FOR COUNCIL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEEcommittee · trigram 0.47
• BURTON CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE FOR '82committee · trigram 0.47
• WEBB CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE, SANDIcommittee · trigram 0.47

Activity

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.

1. 2026-05-17 · principal committee is SANTORO, DEAN · candidate_committees

Aliases (1)

Connected on the graph

1 typed relationship in the influence graph — 1 inbound, 0 outbound, grouped by type.

The full graph

Every typed relationship touching this entity — 1 edge across 1 category. Grouped by what the connection is; the heaviest few are shown, with a link to the full list.