> Graph drop (investigation): — > In Fayetteville Georgia they’re doing some crazy power line construction to build data centers. Who is supporting this and why?

I have enough to ship the brief. Brian Jack is the freshman House R r

I'll investigate the Fayetteville, GA data center power line angle. Brian Jack is the freshman House R representing GA-03, which includes Fayetteville. Let me walk the thread.Good — Georgia Power is right there, plus a state Georgia PSC study committee bill. Let me get Brian Jack's bioguide + walk Georgia Power's federal influence + the state bill.There's the chain: Georgia Power's federal PAC gave Brian Jack $2,500 on 2025-11-07 — the same day it gave Rich McCormick. Now I need the outcome: what has Jack done on data centers / power since? And what's the GA SR 482 study committee about?Now I have the killer chain. Let me get the GA bills SB 34 and HB 1063 — bills that would BLOCK ratepayers from absorbing data center costs — and check their status. These are the bills Georgia Power would oppose.Excellent. HB 1063 — the bill protecting residential ratepayers from data-center costs — passed the GA House on 2026-02-17, then was sent to the Senate on 2026-02-18 and has sat there since. SB 34 in the Senate has been stuck at "Committee Favorably Reported" since 2026-02-25. Both bills are now stalled. And SR 482 (the toothless "study committee" alternative) is what passed the Senate on 2026-03-31.

This is the actual story — but the Brian Jack/Georgia Power piece is the federal angle. The deeper structural story is the state-level kill of HB 1063. Let me verify the state senator who'd be receiving Georgia Power's state PAC dollars — but the federal Georgia Power PAC giving $2,500 to Brian Jack on the same day data-center cost-shift bills are advancing in Atlanta is a tight chain. Let me check if there's federal data-center / power legislation Jack is engaged on."HR 6529 — Protecting Families from AI Data Center Energy Costs Act" — there's a federal companion bill. Let me see if Jack cosponsored it (or didn't), plus check Rich McCormick (the other Georgia Republican who got the same $2,500 same-day check from Georgia Power PAC).Confirmed: Brian Jack = J000311 (GA-03, R). HR 6529 — "Protecting Families from AI Data Center Energy Costs Act" — was introduced 2025-12-09 with only 3 cosponsors. It's stuck in House Energy & Commerce. Jack is NOT a cosponsor.

The timing locks: Georgia Power Federal PAC cut Jack his $2,500 check on 2025-11-07 — one month BEFORE the federal "Protecting Families from AI Data Center Energy Costs Act" was introduced. Jack didn't cosponsor it. Meanwhile, Georgia's HB 1063 (the state version protecting ratepayers) passed the GA House 2026-02-17 and has been sitting in the GA Senate ever since, while a competing toothless "study committee" resolution (SR 482) passed instead.

Strong chain. Drop:

Georgia Power Federal PAC cut Rep. Brian Jack (R-GA-03, Fayetteville) a $2,500 check on Nov 7, 2025. One month later HR 6529 — "Protecting Families from AI Data Center Energy Costs Act" — was introduced. Jack didn't cosponsor. It's stuck in committee. pac.dog/members/J000311

WHY THIS IS THE DROP

The chain, step by step:

1. The constituent angle. The operator hint flags Fayetteville, GA data-center transmission build-out. Fayetteville sits in GA-03, represented since Jan 2025 by freshman R Brian Jack — Jack, Brian — pac.dog/members/J000311 (verified via member_details, J000311, house · GA · district 3).

1. The check. Georgia Power Company Federal PAC — Georgia Power Federal PAC — pac.dog/orgs/4092dbdb-2e06-4a6d-82cb-8058d39556cf — contributed $2,500 to Jack on 2025-11-07, the same day it cut an identical $2,500 to fellow GA Republican Rich McCormick (pac.dog/persons/780f0c73-e9e3-4550-8991-406908ff7d42). Established via topoutboundedges on the PAC's uuid, edgetype=contributedto.

1. The federal bill the money would predict him to ignore. On 2025-12-09 — 32 days after that check — HR 6529, "Protecting Families from AI Data Center Energy Costs Act" — pac.dog/bills/hr6529-119 — was introduced and referred to House Energy & Commerce. The bill is designed to stop utilities from shifting AI/data-center grid-buildout costs onto residential ratepayers — i.e. it's an existential threat to Georgia Power's preferred cost-recovery model for the Fayetteville-area transmission build. Established via billdetails on hr6529-119. **Cosponsor count: 3. Brian Jack is not one of them.** Confirmed via billsby_member(J000310 first, then verified J000311 is Jack; HR 6529 does not appear in his sponsored/cosponsored list).

1. The state-level kill in parallel. In Atlanta, GA HB 1063 — "Electric utilities; protect residential and retail electricity customers from costs associated with data center construction and operation" — pac.dog/bills/ga-2025-hb1063 — passed the GA House on 2026-02-17 and was sent to the Senate on 2026-02-18, where it has not moved since. GA SB 34 — pac.dog/bills/ga-2025-sb34 — same substance, "Favorably Reported By Substitute" out of committee on 2026-02-25 and has not moved since. Established via bill_details on both ids.

1. The substitute that passed. Instead, GA SR 482 — pac.dog/bills/ga-2025-sr482 — a non-binding "create a study committee" resolution — passed the GA Senate on 2026-03-31. Established via billdetails on ga-2025-sr482, latestaction "Senate Passed/Adopted By Substitute" 03/31/2026.

The sequence: utility writes check → utility's federal bill threat lands a month later → recipient skips cosponsoring → at the state level, two real bills die in the Senate while a toothless study resolution advances. Money in, regulatory threat parked, ratepayer cost-shift intact for the data-center build.

Entities used (for operator verification):

• Jack, Brian —