pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HJRES 24 — Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Walk-In Coolers and Walk-In Freezers".

Congress 119

Latest action: — Became Public Law No: 119-7.

Sponsors

Action timeline

  1. · H11100 — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
  2. · Intro-H — Introduced in House
  3. · 1000 — Introduced in House
  4. · H1L210 — Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 242 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 24, H.J. Res. 75 and H.R. 1048. The resolution provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 24 and H.J. Res. 75 under a closed rule, and provides for consideration of H.R. 1048 under a structured rule. Also, the resolution provides for one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit on each measure.
  5. · H38310 — Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  6. · H37100 — On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 203 - 182 (Roll no. 77). (text: CR H1307)
  7. · 8000 — Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 203 - 182 (Roll no. 77). (text: CR H1307)
  8. · H35000 — The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
  9. · H8D000 — DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.J. Res. 24.
  10. · H8D000 — Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 24, H.J. Res. 75 and H.R. 1048. The resolution provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 24 and H.J. Res. 75 under a closed rule, and provides for consideration of H.R. 1048 under a structured rule. Also, the resolution provides for one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit on each measure.
  11. · H30000 — Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 242. (consideration: CR H1307-1311)
  12. — Received in the Senate, read twice.
  13. — Measure laid before Senate by motion. (consideration: CR S2138)
  14. — Motion to proceed to consideration of measure agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 51 - 46. Record Vote Number: 161. (CR S2137-2138: 3)
  15. — Passed Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 53 - 42. Record Vote Number: 162.
  16. · 17000 — Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 53 - 42. Record Vote Number: 162.
  17. — Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S2144, S2147)
  18. — Message on Senate action sent to the House.
  19. · E20000 — Presented to President.
  20. · 28000 — Presented to President.
  21. · E40000 — Became Public Law No: 119-7.
  22. · 36000 — Became Public Law No: 119-7.
  23. · E30000 — Signed by President.
  24. · 36000 — Signed by President.

Text versions

Connected on the graph

Inbound (3)

datefromtypeamountrolesource
—Rulli, Michael A.cosponsor_of_bill—cosponsorsponsorship
—Clyde, Andrew S.cosponsor_of_bill—cosponsorsponsorship
2025-01-16Bice, Stephanie I.sponsor_of_bill—sponsorsponsorship

Outbound (1)

datetypetoamountrolesource
2025-01-03referred_to_committeeHouse Energy and Commerce Committee—congress-committee

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Bice, Stephanie I. (R, house OK-5)sponsor2—7
2Clyde, Andrew S. (R, house GA-9)cosponsor1—2
3Rulli, Michael A. (R, house OH-6)cosponsor0—1

Who's influencing them

Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.

#OrgLDA filingsLDA spendDonor employeesEmployee donationsTotal
1none0$07$17,585$17,585
2saulsbury industries0$02$10,500$10,500
3saulsbury industries, inc.0$02$7,000$7,000
4the law offices of blake a. poole llc0$01$3,500$3,500
5retired0$06$2,141$2,141
6syfan logistics0$01$1,500$1,500
7csmc0$01$1,000$1,000
8humtown products0$01$500$500
9farragut partners0$01$500$500
10joe costa & associates, inc.0$01$250$250
11v2x0$01$100$100
12dept. commerce0$01$50$50

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

107 predicted yes (17%) · 306 predicted no (48%) · 228 unknown (35%)

By party: · R: 107 yes / 0 no / 222 unknown · D: 0 yes / 301 no / 6 unknown · I: 0 yes / 5 no

50 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor) — showing top 50

Activity

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.

  1. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Clyde, Andrew S. (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  2. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Rulli, Michael A. (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  3. 2025-01-16 · sponsored by Bice, Stephanie I. (sponsor) · sponsorship
  4. 2025-01-03 · was referred to House Energy and Commerce Committee · congress-committee

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.

Estimated value: $180/mo per user — but we made it free.