HR 8378 — Indian Ocean Region Strategic Review Act of 2024
Congress 118
Latest action: — Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Action timeline (3)
- · H11100 — Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- · Intro-H — Introduced in House
- · 1000 — Introduced in House
Text versions (1)
- Introduced in House · 2024-05-14 — open
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (1)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
- Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU) Fishing: Frequently Asked Questions
R48215· Reports · 2025-12-23Over the past two decades, successive U.S. Administrations and Congresses have recognized that illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing threatens national, regional, and global security and have acted to combat
Connected on the graph
2 typed relationships in the influence graph — 1 inbound, 1 outbound, grouped by type.
cited in report (1)
| date | dir | entity | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | → | R48215 | — | crs-report-relatedMaterials |
cosponsor of bill (1)
| date | dir | entity | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | ← | Bera, Ami | — | cosponsor | sponsorship |
Who matters on this bill
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bera, Ami (D, house CA-6) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Who's influencing them
Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.
| # | Org | LDA filings | LDA spend | Donor employees | Employee donations | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | not employed | 0 | $0 | 109 | $102,027 | $102,027 |
| 2 | self | 0 | $0 | 19 | $19,933 | $19,933 |
| 3 | western health advantage | 0 | $0 | 2 | $7,500 | $7,500 |
| 4 | urban elements | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 5 | skk developments | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 6 | westbridge | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 7 | uc davis | 0 | $0 | 4 | $6,750 | $6,750 |
| 8 | minnesota urology | 0 | $0 | 15 | $6,500 | $6,500 |
| 9 | self-employed | 0 | $0 | 2 | $6,400 | $6,400 |
| 10 | n/a | 0 | $0 | 12 | $5,950 | $5,950 |
| 11 | koreana plaza market oakland inc. | 0 | $0 | 1 | $5,500 | $5,500 |
| 12 | fulcrum property group | 0 | $0 | 1 | $4,708 | $4,708 |
| 13 | self employed | 0 | $0 | 4 | $4,700 | $4,700 |
| 14 | black davis group | 0 | $0 | 1 | $3,500 | $3,500 |
| 15 | molecule ventures | 0 | $0 | 1 | $3,500 | $3,500 |
| 16 | rahd group | 0 | $0 | 1 | $3,500 | $3,500 |
| 17 | legislative intent services inc. | 0 | $0 | 1 | $3,500 | $3,500 |
| 18 | lilette advisors | 0 | $0 | 1 | $3,500 | $3,500 |
| 19 | beekman advisors inc. | 0 | $0 | 1 | $3,500 | $3,500 |
| 20 | jk strategies | 0 | $0 | 1 | $3,500 | $3,500 |
| 21 | oracle corporation | 0 | $0 | 1 | $3,500 | $3,500 |
| 22 | bellwether government affairs | 0 | $0 | 1 | $3,000 | $3,000 |
| 23 | social innovation venutres | 0 | $0 | 1 | $3,000 | $3,000 |
| 24 | thomas capitol partners inc. | 0 | $0 | 1 | $2,750 | $2,750 |
| 25 | blackwatch international llc | 0 | $0 | 1 | $2,500 | $2,500 |
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
1 predicted yes (0%) · 280 predicted no (52%) · 262 unknown (48%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 1 yes / 0 no / 262 unknown · I: 0 yes / 3 no
1 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor)
- Bera, Ami (D · house · CA-6) · cosponsor
Timeline
Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; the inline strip under the row shows the counterpart's own context (a bill's latest action, a hearing's chamber + date, a filing's form type + filed date, a clip's source + excerpt) so the timeline reads like a Wikipedia citation rail.
- 2026-05-25 · Cited in GAO report R48215 · crs-report-relatedMaterials
- 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Bera, Ami (cosponsor) · sponsorship