SB 375 — Senate Bill 375 of 2025
MI 2025 session · introduced 2025-06-10
Sponsors (6)
- Jeff Irwin (D, MI-15) — sponsor
- Rosemary Bayer (D, MI-13) — cosponsor
- Mary Cavanagh (D, MI-6) — cosponsor
- Stephanie Chang (D, MI-3) — cosponsor
- Veronica Klinefelt (D, MI-11) — cosponsor
- Erika Geiss (D, MI-1) — cosponsor
Action timeline (6)
- · senate — INTRODUCED BY SENATOR JEFF IRWIN
- · senate — REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON HOUSING AND HUMAN SERVICES
- · senate — REPORTED FAVORABLY WITHOUT AMENDMENT 9/9/2025
- · senate — REFERRED TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
- · senate — REPORTED BY COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE FAVORABLY WITHOUT AMENDMENT(S)
- · senate — PLACED ON ORDER OF THIRD READING
Text versions (0)
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
No CRS reports cite this bill yet.
Who matters on this bill
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jeff Irwin (D, state_upper MI-15) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 2 | Erika Geiss (D, state_upper MI-1) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 3 | Mary Cavanagh (D, state_upper MI-6) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 4 | Rosemary Bayer (D, state_upper MI-13) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 5 | Stephanie Chang (D, state_upper MI-3) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 6 | Veronica Klinefelt (D, state_upper MI-11) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no