browse Browse

pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

SJRES 28A joint resolution disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications".

Congress 119 · introduced 2025-02-27

Latest action: Became Public Law No: 119-11.

Sponsors

Action timeline

  1. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
  2. · 10000 Introduced in Senate
  3. Measure laid before Senate by motion. (consideration: CR S1489)
  4. Motion to proceed to consideration of measure agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 50 - 47. Record Vote Number: 103. (CR S1489)
  5. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 20.
  6. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c).
  7. · 14500 Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c).
  8. Passed Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 51 - 47. Record Vote Number: 106.
  9. · 17000 Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 51 - 47. Record Vote Number: 106.
  10. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S1503, S1510-1511, S1520-1521)
  11. Message on Senate action sent to the House.
  12. · H15000 Held at the Desk
  13. · H14000 Received in the House
  14. · H1L220 Rule H. Res. 282 failed passage of House.
  15. · H1L210 Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 282 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28. The resolution also provides that H. Res. 23 and H. Res. 164 are laid on the table.
  16. · H1L210 Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 294 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 18, S.J. Res. 28, H.R. 1526 and H.R. 22. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28.
  17. · H38310 Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  18. · H37100 On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 219 - 211 (Roll no. 95). (text: CR H1514)
  19. · 8000 Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 219 - 211 (Roll no. 95). (text: CR H1514: 2)
  20. · H30000 Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1532-1533)
  21. · H8D000 POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on S.J. Res. 28, the Chair put the question on passage of the joint resolution and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Hill (AR) demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
  22. · H35000 The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
  23. · H8D000 DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on S.J. Res. 28.
  24. · H8D000 Rule provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 18, S.J. Res. 28, H.R. 1526 and H.R. 22. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28.
  25. · H30000 Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 294. (consideration: CR H1514-1519)
  26. · E20000 Presented to President.
  27. · 28000 Presented to President.
  28. · E40000 Became Public Law No: 119-11.
  29. · 36000 Became Public Law No: 119-11.
  30. · E30000 Signed by President.
  31. · 36000 Signed by President.

Text versions

Connected on the graph

2 typed relationships in the influence graph — 1 inbound, 1 outbound, grouped by type.

referred to committee (1)
datedirentityamountrolesource
2025-01-03Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committeecongress-committee
sponsor of bill (1)
datedirentityamountrolesource
2025-02-27Ricketts, Petesponsorsponsorship

The full graph

Every typed relationship touching this entity — 2 edges across 2 categories. Grouped by what the connection is; the heaviest few are shown, with a link to the full list.

Committees

Referred to committee 1 edge

Legislation

Sponsored bill 1 edge

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Ricketts, Pete (R, senate NE)sponsor910

Who's influencing them

Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.

#OrgLDA filingsLDA spendDonor employeesEmployee donationsTotal
1pearson & associates0$0106$225,754$225,754
2s-3 group0$037$69,850$69,850
3holtzman vogel, pllc0$018$62,100$62,100
4u.s. travel association0$06$46,290$46,290
5bp0$012$31,200$31,200
6retired0$012$17,334$17,334
7bunge north america pac0$07$15,800$15,800
8edw. c levy co0$01$14,040$14,040
9state of tennessee0$01$14,000$14,000
10the windquest group0$02$14,000$14,000
11deloitte pac0$05$11,500$11,500
12elliott investment management0$01$10,500$10,500
13charles potomac capital, llc0$01$10,500$10,500
14perceptive advisors0$01$10,500$10,500
15cumberland development0$01$10,500$10,500
16eagle const. talon development0$01$10,500$10,500
17state of nebraska0$03$9,500$9,500
18open ai0$03$9,250$9,250
19family foundation0$01$7,000$7,000
20a priori0$01$7,000$7,000
21continuum ventures0$01$7,000$7,000
22fisher investments0$01$7,000$7,000
23carolyn rowan collection llc0$01$7,000$7,000
24ceo0$01$7,000$7,000
25diamondbacks0$01$7,000$7,000

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

5 predicted yes (1%) · 266 predicted no (49%) · 273 unknown (50%)

By party: · R: 5 yes / 0 no / 273 unknown · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no

5 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor)

Activity

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.

  1. 2025-02-27 · sponsored by Ricketts, Pete (sponsor) · sponsorship
  2. 2025-01-03 · was referred to Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee · congress-committee

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.